• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

WDTX Jury Finds Lyft Infringed Patent

March 10, 2026 Alexa Shrake

Even though a jury in the Western District of Texas recently found Lyft infringed a patent and owes damages, the rideshare company is hailing the result as a victory.

The jury awarded damages Thursday of $1.05 million as a lump sum to Quartz Auto Technologies. Quartz had alleged in its lawsuit that Lyft infringed five of its patents, but by the time the case made it to the jury, only one infringement claim remained.

“Patent holders often believe that accused infringers will eventually settle because the math of litigation feels impossible. We made sure that math worked differently here,” Roger Fulghum, who led the Baker Botts trial team, said in a news release. “Four patents were gone before trial, and the lump sum verdict on the last one gives Lyft real finality. That’s what this team built toward from the beginning.”

In a news release, Baker Botts said the damages award, handed down after a five-day trial before U.S. District Judge Alan Albright, represents less than 0.5% of what Quartz was seeking.

The firm secured the dismissal of one patent for improper venue. It then obtained judgment on the pleadings for three patents, which Judge Albright held were based on abstract ideas that were not patentable.

Quartz alleged that the remaining patent was infringed by Lyft’s Smart Trip Check-In feature, a safety measure that monitors rides in real-time.

Lyft and Quartz Auto have a litigation history.

To fight Quartz Auto’s allegations, Lyft filed a 2021 declaratory judgment action in the Northern District of California. The Baker Botts’ team eliminated four challenged patents, a win that was upheld by the Federal Circuit.

Quartz Auto filed its motion for an injunction last night.

Quartz is represented by Jon A. Birmingham, Mary F. Fetsco and Jacqueline Thompson of Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, Andrew Strabone, Erick Franklund, Jason G. Sheasby, Michael M. Rosen and Nora Chestney of Irell & Manella and Massimo Ciccarelli of Ciccarelli Law Firm.

Baker Botts lawyers Jeremy Taylor, Lauren Dreyer, Katherine Burgess, Nick Baniel, Nolan McQueen, Kira Gill, Billy Ellis, Danny David, and Scott Powers also represented Lyft.

The case is Quartz Auto Technologies LLC v. Lyft, Inc.,1:20-cv-00719.

Alexa Shrake

Alexa covers litigation and trials for The Texas Lawbook.

View Alexa’s articles

Email Alexa

©2026 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Mayer Brown Lands Six-Partner Litigation Group
  • WDTX Jury Finds Lyft Infringed Patent
  • Citi Report: Texas Law Firms Hit Double-Digit Revenue, Profit Increases in 2025
  • DLA Piper Adds Corporate, Securities Litigation Partner to Austin Office
  • Jury Trial Begins in Mesothelioma Case Against J&J

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2026 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.