• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Dallas-Based DOBS Gets Whopping $966M Verdict Against J&J in California 

October 6, 2025 Michelle Casady

Dean Omar Branham Shirley, the Dallas-based law firm that has racked up numerous wins on behalf of clients who allege Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder caused their mesothelioma, has done it again. 

In a verdict returned by a California jury Monday evening, jurors determined Mae Moore, who died in December 2021 of mesothelioma, was exposed to Johnson’s baby powder or Shower to Shower, a body powder product, that contained asbestos, that the company was negligent in selling the product and that it was a substantial cause of Moore contracting mesothelioma. 

Jurors also held the company failed to adequately warn of the dangers of the products, which were “known or knowable in light of the scientific and medical knowledge that was generally accepted in the scientific community at the time of manufacture, distribution [and] sale.” 

For pain and suffering, the jury awarded Moore $6 million and her three adult children a collective $10 million in damages “for the loss of Mae Moore’s love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection, society, moral support, training and advice.” 

The panel rejected arguments that Avon, Chanel Inc., Colgate-Palmolive and Revlon Inc., who were all non-parties in the lawsuit, were negligent or at fault for Moore’s injuries. The jurors determined none of the following products were responsible for Moore’s injuries: Skin So Soft, Night Magic, Sweet Honesty, Timeless, Chanel No. 5, Chanel No. 19, Cashmere Bouquet and Jean Naté. 

The jury slammed Johnson & Johnson with $950 million in punitive damages. 

Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, issued a statement to The Lawbook Tuesday vowing to “immediately appeal this egregious and unconstitutional verdict.” 

He noted Johnson & Johnson prevailed against DOBS in a talc case last week in South Carolina and argued the Dallas-based plaintiff firm “based their arguments on ‘junk science’ that never should have been presented to the jury, as it is refuted by decades of studies demonstrating Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer.” 

“The plaintiff lawyers’ business model is to roll the dice in search of jackpot verdicts, fueled by litigation-funded junk science, without regard to the fact that most claimants recover nothing in the tort system,” the statement reads.

DOBS lawyer Trey Branham issued a statement to The Lawbook Tuesday that Moore’s lawsuit “was delayed by Johnson & Johnson’s bad faith bankruptcies.” 

“While justice was slow in coming, the jury spoke and spoke loudly,” the statement reads. “We remain ever hopeful that Johnson & Johnson will finally accept responsibility for these senseless deaths.”

Including Branham, DOBS lawyers Danny Kraft and Venus Burns represented the plaintiff. 

The case number is CV-05513 in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. 

Update: This article has been updated with comments from Johnson & Johnson and Dean Omar Branham Shirley. 

Michelle Casady

Michelle Casady is based in Houston and covers litigation and appeals — including trials, breaking news and industry trends — for The Texas Lawbook.

View Michelle’s articles

Email Michelle

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • P.S. — White & Case Partner: Pro Bono Veterans Wills, Estate Services Have ‘Very Tangible Personal Impact’ 
  • Houston Appellate Court Won’t DQ AZA as Transocean Defense Counsel
  • Texas Emerges as a Leading Force in State Privacy Law Enforcement
  • Haynes Boone Duo Wins $973K Pro Bono Fraud Verdict in Trial Debut 
  • Asked & Answered with Susman Godfrey’s Justin Nelson: Try Your Best, Be Polite and Do Justice

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.