• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

DOJ Guidance May Put Executives at Risk — WhatsApp with That?

July 25, 2023 Stephen Toland

The United States Department of Justice continues to make corporate criminal enforcement a top priority in 2023. The latest corporate compliance guidelines issued by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco in September of last year and again this March address the risks of employees’ personal conversations on encrypted chat applications such as WhatsApp — risks that apply to personal conversations of all employees, including top executives.

As awareness of this measure increases, organizations should create policies to minimize their risk should they find themselves involved in a DOJ investigation.

What Brought This About?

The impetus behind the ban on encrypted messaging apps is the apps’ inability to retain messages after they are sent, frustrating DOJ prosecutors in their efforts to investigate white collar crime. These apps are widely used because they are more efficient and can expedite communications across time zones. However, the encryption feature is also attractive to those who want to communicate information that may be unethical.

Many multinational companies have already tightened their messaging policies in accordance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In 2017, the DOJ demanded that companies seeking cooperation credit in FCPA cases must prohibit employees from using apps that don’t properly retain messages. Those rules were relaxed in 2019.

Monaco’s recent directive marks a return to a tougher approach — merely having a policy to disfavor unmonitored chats won’t be enough for the DOJ.

Corporate Compliance Guidance

The 2023 DOJ Evaluation Guidance provides prosecutors with key factors to consider as they evaluate corporate compliance programs facing a criminal resolution. Monaco advised that “all corporations with robust compliance programs should have effective policies governing the use of personal devices and third-party messaging platforms.”

Those factors include:

  • All employees should be interviewed to determine if employees are talking about work on external messaging apps;
  • Current policies should be reviewed and updated to include messaging on third-party apps, in compliance with DOJ guidance;
  • New and existing employees need to be trained on the importance of complying with the new policy;
  • New compliance policies should be reviewed consistently, including updates to employee handbooks and posting policies in public spaces at work;
  • Supervisors and managers should be trained on how to apply workplace policies in a fair and consistent manner for employees who continue to use external messaging apps for work communications; and
  • Voluntary self-disclosure of misconduct is recommended as the clearest path for a company to avoid a guilty plea or an indictment from the DOJ.

These guidelines set an expectation that company leadership will identify to DOJ prosecutors those individuals connected with corporate misconduct in a timely manner to receive cooperation credit. Additionally, they assume that prosecutors should try to resolve individual investigations prior to entering a corporate resolution.

Bottom Line

If a company finds themselves in the midst of a DOJ investigation, more lenience will be shown to corporations with strong compliance programs that are tested, effective, adequately resourced and fully implemented. Businesses that do not incorporate these guidelines into their corporate culture and turn a blind eye to them will instead see a more serious outcome from the DOJ.

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Mediation Fails in Jackson Walker, U.S. Trustee Bankruptcy Fee Dispute
  • Fifth Circuit Tells Judge O’Connor More Analysis Needed in Media Matters, X Corp. Venue Spat
  • Willkie Continues to Expand its Dallas Office with Veteran Dealmakers
  • FBFK Adds Two Lawyers to its Austin Office
  • Litigation Roundup: CEO Indicted in Alleged UT Austin Arena Bid Rigging Conspiracy

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.