• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Goldman Sachs Accused of Age Discrimination, Wrongful Termination in Arbitration Claim

March 18, 2026 Alexa Shrake

Dallas-based law firm Rogge Dunn Group filed a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration claim against Goldman Sachs, alleging that it committed age discrimination, wrongful termination and unlawful withholding of earned deferred compensation.

Don Lavi, 63, of San Francisco, was an advisor at Goldman Sachs for 20 years until the company allegedly gave him a day to either involuntarily retire or be fired.

According to the filing, Lavi managed a book of business totaling approximately $1.6 billion, including roughly $1.2 billion in assets under management. 

Goldman Sachs recruited Lavi from Sanford Bernstein & Co. in 2005. According to the complaint, Lavi received positive reviews and was never placed on heightened supervision, probation or a performance-improvement plan.

The complaint alleges that Goldman presented Lavi with a “take it or leave it” ultimatum — retire immediately and sign a release of all claims or be fired in 24 hours. When Lavi requested additional time and information and complained of age discrimination, the firm terminated him days later, according to the claim. When Lavi asked HR to see the release and severance documents before making such a life-changing decision, Goldman’s HR professional refused in an email.

“In 35 years of handling FINRA and employment matters I’ve never seen an employer tell an employee they have to decide whether to accept a severance package or be fired — while refusing to provide the legal documents regarding the severance package for the employee to analyze before the employee has to make such an important, life changing decision,” Rogge Dunn of Rogge Dunn Group told The Texas Lawbook.

According to the claim, Goldman Sachs unlawfully forfeited more than $1 million in deferred compensation owed to Lavi. The filing contends that these practices violate federal law, including ERISA, as well as California labor laws governing earned wages.

Lavi is seeking more than $2 million in damages and $1 million in punitive damages.

Goldman Sachs will need to respond to the filing, and then an initial pre-hearing conference will be set.

Patrick McShan of Rogge Dunn Group is also representing Lavi.

Alexa Shrake

Alexa covers litigation and trials for The Texas Lawbook.

View Alexa’s articles

Email Alexa

©2026 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • P.S. — Texas Appleseed Launches 30th Anniversary Campaign with $1.5M Goal 
  • Houston Property Owners Win Takings Case Over Hurricane Harvey Downstream Flooding
  • Surveillance by Design? How the California Invasion of Privacy Act Threatens Texas Businesses
  • ‘People Are Definitely Going to Get Sick’: Trial Over Texas Prison Heat Awaits Ruling
  • Asked & Answered with Bracewell’s Steve Benesh: Legal Deserts, Star Trek and Gold

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2026 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.