• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

DBJ: Tinder Founders Sue Match for $2B

August 14, 2018 Mark Curriden

By Brian Womack of The Dallas Business Journal

(Aug. 14) – Dallas’ Match Group is having relationship problems.

The company and its parent IAC are being sued by founders of Tinder, along with current executives and early employees, for manipulating financial information, according to a new filing. The lawsuit seeks at least $2 billion.

Tinder, which operates out of Los Angeles, is owned by Match Group.

“(The) defendants’ path to Tinder ‘gold’ was paved with systematic exploitation and greed,” the suit states. “For years, defendants cheated the Tinder plaintiffs out of the credit and value they had earned – culminating in (the) defendants’ scheme to deprive the Tinder plaintiffs of their contractual rights as Tinder option holders.”

IAC didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Match Group is grappling with lawsuits while it seeks to keep its digital properties popular with consumers. Earlier this year, Match Group sued Bumble, a women-centric dating app, for patent infringement and misappropriation of intellectual property. Later on, the Austin-based startup, led by former Tinder exec and co-founder Whitney Wolfe, filed it’s own suit, alleging that Match Group filed its lawsuit with false and disparaging information in order to make Bumble less attractive to potential acquirers.

The Match Group portfolio also includes OkCupid and PlentyOfFish.

In Tinder’s case filed against Match, the plaintiffs also allege that in 2016, former Match chairman and CEO Greg Blatt groped and sexually harassed the vice president of marketing and communications, but that the incident was “covered up” as part of the scheme to deprive the plaintiffs, the case said.

For more business news, please visit bizjournals.com/dallas.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • SPACs Gobble Targets Ahead of Thanksgiving
  • Lawyers Discuss Impact of Judge Smith’s Scathing Dissent in Redistricting Case
  • Former TV News Anchor Gets 10 Years in Pandemic Loan Scam
  • Lynn Pinker Wins Trade Secrets Case in Eastern District of Texas
  • P.S. — White & Case Partner: Pro Bono Veterans Wills, Estate Services Have ‘Very Tangible Personal Impact’ 

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.