• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Trials & Litigation
    • Business Litigation of the Year
    • Employment
    • Energy/Environmental
    • IP/Patent
    • Mass/Toxic Torts
    • Texas Business Court
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Judge’s Post-trial Recusal Throws Edgemere Dispute Into Limbo

August 11, 2026 Alexa Shrake

After the attorneys argued their case at trial and submitted post-trial briefs to U.S. District Court Judge Ada Brown, the judge recused herself without explanation. Now, the attorneys may have to retry the case before a new judge.

The bench trial between the trustee of a Dallas luxury senior living community and its landlord began in May.

Edgemere, located in University Park, signed a ground lease agreement with Intercity Investment Properties in 1999 for 55 years. However, the company began to struggle financially, defaulted on payments and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2022.

The Dallas Morning News reported the senior living community was bought by Bay 9 Holdings LLC in June 2023 for about $48.5 million. Certus Living now manages the community.

The trustee of the Edgemere Litigation Trust, former Western District Bankruptcy Court Judge Leif Clark, asserted claims against Intercity for breach of contract and fraud. The claims include breach of a nondisclosure agreement, promissory fraud, tortious interference, breach of forbearance agreement, civil conspiracy and equitable subordination.

In July, Judge Brown recused herself from the case, which was reassigned to Judge Brantley Starr.

Lead counsels for the parties, Greg Taylor of Diamond McCarthy Taylor & Finley and Jamil Alibhai of Munsch Hardt Kopf and Harr, said they were unaware of the reason for Judge Brown’s recusal.

Judge Starr stated he could either rule on the existing record or retry the case if the parties wished to recall witnesses. According to the docket, he would give each side four hours to retry the case to him.

Taylor said they have requested to recall some witnesses, but Judge Starr has not ruled on that request at this time.

Allen Diamond, Brian Hogue, Christopher Johnson, Drew Jones and Stephen Loden of Diamond McCarthy Taylor & Finley also represented Edgemere.

Garrick Smith, Brent Turman, Caroline Rumbolo, Chad Ray, Michael Harvey and Toni Swanger of Munsch Hardt Kopf and Harr also represented Intercity Investments Properties.

The case number is 3:24-cv-03075.

Alexa Shrake

Alexa covers litigation and trials for The Texas Lawbook.

View Alexa’s articles

Email Alexa

©2026 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Judge’s Post-trial Recusal Throws Edgemere Dispute Into Limbo
  • Mark Cuban’s Rule 202 Petition Dismissed by Texas Business Court
  • Dallas Marina Operator Snaps Up MarineMax for $1.5B
  • Jury Finds 3M Partially Responsible for Fatal 2020 Explosion, Awards $62.3M
  • Kirkland Hires Top-Notch Trial Lawyer from Gibson Dunn

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2026 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.