• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Chron: With $3.5B fee, a Halliburton-Baker Hughes Breakup Would be Costly

April 11, 2016 Mark Curriden

By Robert Grattan of the Houston Chronicle

(April 11) – Halliburton Co. is potentially on the hook to pay one of the largest breakup fees in U.S. corporate history now that regulators have sued to block its deal to buy Baker Hughes.

The $3.5 billion breakup fee it agreed to pay if its deal is scuttled would be the largest antitrust fee paid since the Justice Department quashed AT&T’s bid to buy T-Mobile USA in 2011 and triggered a $4 billion charge.

And it vastly exceeds the averages.

It represents nearly 13 percent of the deal’s $26.6 billion present value. By contrast, the average antitrust fee was 5.5 percent and the median was 4.3 percent in an analysis of 104 similar deals over the past decade, according to New York City-based law firm Shearman & Sterling LLP’s.

Jeff Floyd
Jeff Floyd

Jeff Floyd of Vinson & Elkins tells the Houston Chronicle that ironically, some of the extra scrutiny the deal received was possibly triggered by the large breakup fee that Hallburton disclosed when it announced the merger in November 2014.

“These things are a two-edge sword when you’re negotiating them, Floyd tells the Chron. “You’ve sort of highlighted an acknowledged that there’s a real regulatory risk.”

Orrin Harrison
Orrin Harrison

But should Halliburton and Baker Hughes’ fight with the DOJ become unsuccessful and the deal officially falls apart, the breakup fee payment might be litigated or reduced through negotiation, Orrin Harrison of Gruber Elrod Johansen Hail Shank tells the Chron.

“These agreements have all kinds of outs in them,” he said.

Read the Houston Chronicle’s full report here.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • SCOTX Sides with American Midstream, Reverses Rainbow Energy Marketing’s $6.1M Win
  • SCOTX Reverses Negligence Verdict in Harvey Flooding Case
  • Q&A With Trial Lawyer Kim Bueno 
  • Fired Trucking Company Wins $9.5M Verdict in Suit Against El Rancho Supermercado
  • How Waste Management and Charles Boettcher Sealed the Stericycle Deal

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.