• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Wrongful Death Suit Over Worker’s Electrocution is a Grab for a ‘Champagne and Caviar Lifestyle,’ Defense Lawyer Says

November 14, 2022 Bruce Tomaso

The plaintiff in a wrongful death suit stemming from the 2019 electrocution of a worker at a West Texas midstream energy plant is seeking “Kardashian cash” – and may not be entitled to a penny, because she was the electrician’s girlfriend, not his common-law wife – lawyers for the plant told a Dallas County jury Monday.

The comments came in closing arguments in an 11-day trial in a suit filed by Maria de los Angeles Rodriguez, identified in the complaint as the widow of 44-year-old electrician Gabriel Vela, who was killed May 4, 2019, while working in the motor control center of the Lobo III midstream gas facility in Luling County.

Jurors in the court of state District Judge Monica McCoy Purdy deliberated through the afternoon without reaching a verdict. They are to resume their deliberations Tuesday morning.

McAllen trial lawyer Ray Thomas, Rodriguez’s lawyer, and Michael K. Hurst of Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann, representing Vela’s aged, ailing parents, said their clients are entitled to collective damages, including exemplary damages, in the range of $100 million because plant officials and the electrical contracting company that employed Vela were grossly negligent in allowing Vela to work unsupervised on a live electrical cabinet that was, according to a work order, supposed to have been “cold,” or de-energized.

“That work permit turned out to be Gabriel’s death warrant,” Thomas said, adding that in 34 years of practice, “I’ve never seen a case of gross negligence like this.”

The plant, in Mentone, Texas, is operated by EnLink Midstream of Dallas and owned by Delaware G&P, an EnLink subsidiary. Their principal lawyer in the case is J.J. Knauff of the Miller Knauff Law Firm of Dallas.

Knauff said his clients “did nothing wrong” and called the plaintiff attorneys’ suggestion of a $100 million verdict, including punitive damages, “a circus of silliness,” a “lawsuit land narrative,” “funny money numbers” and “Kardashian cash,” that would guarantee Vela’s survivors a “champagne and caviar lifestyle that they have never had.”

A co-defendant, OGT, the contractor that employed Vela, is principally represented by Jim Grau, managing partner of Grau Law in Dallas.

A fourth defendant, Applied Consultants Inc., the on-site safety representative hired by EnLink to oversee a 2019 expansion of the Lobo III natural gas plant, settled with Vela’s family during trial for $2 million, according to statements in open court.

Grau called OGT “an award-winning company” and said Vela was “a very, very experienced electrician” with 25 years’ experience who should have known the electrical cabinet he was working on was energized, in part because there’d been an “arc flash” in the cabinet the day before he was electrocuted – an event the electrician was warned about at least three times.

Defense lawyers contended during the trial that Vela caused his own death by doing work beyond what he was authorized to do and by improperly removing isolation barriers, or safety shields, in the electrical cabinet, thereby exposing live conductors.

“We do think that he was negligent. … I don’t like telling you that, but that’s what the facts are,” Grau said in his closing argument.

Tamara L. Rodriguez, a partner with Vidaurri, Rodriguez & Reyna in Edinburgh and, along with Knauff, one of EnLink’s defense attorneys, said employment records, income tax forms and other evidence cast doubt on Maria Rodriguez’s claim that she and Vela had a common-law marriage.

“Just because they lived together does not mean they were husband and wife,” she said, adding, “I think she’s lying to you” because a “girlfriend” is entitled to nothing in a wrongful death case.

“She doesn’t need private jets, fancy cars,” the attorney said. “That’s what $70 million [Maria Rodriguez’s share of the suggested $100 million verdict] buys you.”

Hurst played for the jury an excerpt of the videotaped deposition of Vela’s father, Jose Vela, in which the father sobbed uncontrollably when asked to describe his relationship with Gabriel and the effect on his life of his son’s death.

“He was my son,” Jose Vela said, speaking in Spanish. “It hurt me a lot.”

“No one should have to bury his child,” Hurst told the jurors.

He said EnLink’s “lip-service safety culture resulted in a man’s death,” adding, “all these defendants listen to and know is money. … It is not OK to cut corners. … If you say it loud enough, maybe they’ll listen.”

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • SCOTX Sides with American Midstream, Reverses Rainbow Energy Marketing’s $6.1M Win
  • SCOTX Reverses Negligence Verdict in Harvey Flooding Case
  • Q&A With Trial Lawyer Kim Bueno 
  • Fired Trucking Company Wins $9.5M Verdict in Suit Against El Rancho Supermercado
  • How Waste Management and Charles Boettcher Sealed the Stericycle Deal

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.