• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

SEC Charges Eight ‘Stock-Picking Gurus’ on Twitter with $100M Scam to Manipulate Share Prices

December 14, 2022 Bruce Tomaso & Michelle Casady

Four Houston-area men were among eight social media influencers accused Wednesday by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of using Twitter, online chat rooms and a podcast to manipulate stock prices in a $100 million trading scam.

According to a civil action filed by the SEC in federal court in Houston, the eight defendants conspired to promote stocks via social media, then dumped shares they’d purchased once their promotional efforts drove up the stocks’ prices.

“To their legions of followers on social media, the eight defendants have, for years, promoted themselves as trustworthy stock-picking gurus. In reality, they are seasoned stock manipulators,” the SEC complaint said.

“They identify stocks ripe for manipulation, acquire substantial positions in these securities, and then recommend those stocks as good investments. … They encourage their followers to purchase the selected stocks, often claiming that they likewise have bought or intend to buy these stocks for themselves and hold them. Instead, the defendants sell their shares into the demand that their deceptive promotions generate.”

The defendants – who are also named in a parallel criminal complaint filed under seal last week in federal court in Houston – are:

  • Daniel Knight of Houston;
  • Edward Constantin, identified in the civil suit as a Houston resident, but in a request by the government for issuance of a summons as living in Montgomery;
  • Perry Matlock of The Woodlands;
  • John Rybarczyk of Spring;
  • Thomas Cooperman and Gary Deel of Beverly Hills, California;
  • Stefan Hrvatin of Miami;
  • Mitchell Hennessey of West New York, New Jersey.

Seven of the defendants – Matlock, Constantin, Cooperman, Deel, Hennessey, Hrvatin and Rybarcyzk – promoted themselves as successful traders on Twitter and Discord, an instant messaging and voice chat platform, the SEC complaint said. It said that, combined, they had more than 1.8 million followers on Twitter.

The eighth defendant, Knight, co-hosted with Hennessey “a popular stock-trading podcast that promoted the other defendants as expert traders and provided a platform …  to deceptively promote the stocks they intended to dump,” the complaint said.

As of Wednesday afternoon, court records available electronically did not list attorneys for the eight men in either the civil or the criminal case.

Matlock’s Twitter account has been deleted; five of his co-defendants last tweeted on Monday, one on Saturday.

Only Constantin, whose Twitter handle is @MrZackMorris, was still active on the platform Wednesday, tweeting at 12:37 a.m.: “I love my homies on here. The rest of you can keep swinging on my nuts.” 

Joseph Sansone, chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit, said in a news release: “The defendants used social media to amass a large following of novice investors and then took advantage of their followers by repeatedly feeding them a steady diet of misinformation, which resulted in fraudulent profits of approximately $100 million.

“Today’s action exposes the true motivation of these alleged fraudsters and serves as another warning that investors should be wary of unsolicited advice they encounter online.”

The government team in the civil suit is led by two SEC lawyers from Boston, David D’Addio and Amy Burkhart. The lead prosecutor in the criminal case is Thomas Heyward Carter of the U.S. attorney’s office in Houston.

The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against each defendant. The criminal complaint charges them with securities fraud and conspiracy.

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Texas Reaches $1.375B Settlement with Google in Data Privacy Suits
  • KBR Gets Complete Defense Win in Houston Trial Over $18B Mexican Refinery Job
  • P.S. — Hispanic Law Foundation’s ‘Thank You’ is ‘Deeper Than It’s Ever Been,’ President Says at Scholarship Luncheon 
  • Jackson Walker Hires Former Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht
  • First CEO of San Antonio Legal Services Association Steps Down from Non-profit, Board Initiates Search  

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.