• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Baker Botts Advises Williams Partners in $2.4 Billion Deal

November 2, 2012 Natalie Posgate

© 2012 The Texas Lawbook.

By Natalie Posgate
Staff Writer for The Texas Lawbook

Tulsa, Okla.-based Williams Partners has agreed to acquire $2.4 billion in chemical and pipeline assets from its affiliated business, The Williams Companies.

The primary asset in the transaction is 83 percent of interest in the olefins production facility in Geismar, La. Other important assets include a refinery-grade propylene splitter and, through its subsidiary Williams Olefins Feedstock Pipelines, LLC, certain feedstock and product pipelines.

Baker Botts is representing Williams Partners in the transaction. Houston corporate partner Josh Davidson is leading the deal, while Houston tax partner Mike Bresson, Austin associates Sally Russell, Alyssia Bernazal and special counsel Chuck Campbell of Houston, are assisting.

Davidson and Russell previously worked with Williams Partners on seven top-down transactions by representing the company’s Conflicts Committee of the Board of Directors of the general partner.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is representing Williams, along with some of the company’s in-house lawyers.

The deal announced is consistent with a recent private letter ruling by the IRS in which the tax agency treated revenues derived from certain operations that turn natural gas liquids into olefins for the purpose of plastic production as generating income to a master limited partnership (MLP), which is how Williams Partners is structured.

Davidson says the Williams transaction is important because it is the first to involve a MLP acquiring an ethylene cracker and may lead other chemical companies to consider forming MLPs for some of their assets.

“At least 90 percent of a MLP’s gross income each year must be qualifying, meaning it must come from certain permitted sources, typically involving minerals or natural resources,” he said. “The market appears to be expecting other chemical companies to consider forming their own MLPs.”

© 2012 The Texas Lawbook. Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

Natalie Posgate

Natalie Posgate covers pro bono work, public service and diversity within the Texas legal community.

View Natalie’s articles

Email Natalie

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • SCOTX Sides With Southwest Pilots Union in Boeing Suit
  • Judge Weighs Sanctions, Dismissal Motion in Pioneer Natural Resources Suit
  • Former TV News Anchor Guilty in $300M Pandemic Loan Scam
  • No Texas Jurisdiction Over Foreign Airplane Engine Maker, SCOTX Says
  • P.S. — Attorneys Serving the Community Raises More Than $586K for POETIC, Voting Rights Act Commemorated

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.