• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

SEC Slaps SandRidge Energy for $1.4 Million for Illegal Retaliation Against Whistleblower

December 20, 2016 Mark Curriden

© 2016 The Texas Lawbook.

By Mark Curriden

(Dec. 20) – Oklahoma City-based SandRidge Energy Inc. has agreed to pay a $1.4 million fine after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission accused the bankrupt oil and gas company of firing an internal whistleblower who questioned how company officials calculated its publicly reported oil-and-gas reserves.

SEC officials in the Fort Worth Regional Office announced Tuesday that SandRidge officials ignored 2011 federal whistleblower protection laws by regularly using restrictive language in their employee separation agreements that prohibited outgoing workers from participating in any government investigation or disclosing information potentially harmful or embarrassing to the company.

Shamoil Shipchandler

SEC Regional Director Shamoil T. Shipchandler said Tuesday that SandRidge officials fired an internal whistleblower who repeatedly raised concerns about the process the company used to determine its oil-and-gas reserves, which were then publicly announced and relied upon by investors.

The whistleblowing employee, according to the SEC, was initially offered a promotion by SandRidge. When the employee rejected the offer, SandRidge senior managers later concluded the worker was disruptive and could be replaced with someone “who could do the work without creating all the internal strife.”

Shipchandler said that the company conducted no substantial investigation of the whistleblower’s concerns.

“Ignoring a rule that protects communications between outgoing employees and the SEC, SandRidge flatly prohibited such contact in their separation agreements and at the same time retaliated against an employee who raised concerns about the company to its management,” Shipchandler said in a written statement.

Despite agreeing to pay the $1.4 million penalty, SandRidge did not admit or deny the SEC’s charges. The agreement must still be approved by a federal bankruptcy judge who is handling SandRidge’s reorganization.

The SEC lawyers who led the investigation into SandRidge were Tamara F. McCreary, Timothy L. Evans, David R. King and supervisor Jonathan P. Scott.

Covington & Burling partner David Kornblau represents SandRidge.

“Whistleblowers who step forward and raise concerns internally to their companies about potential securities law violations should be protected from retaliation regardless of whether they have filed a complaint with the SEC,” said Jane Norberg, who is chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower. “This is the first time a company is being charged for retaliating against an internal whistleblower, and the second enforcement action this week against a company for impeding employees from communicating with the SEC.”

© 2016 The Texas Lawbook. Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • How Candidates and Employers Can Avoid AI Pitfalls in the Hiring Process
  • P.S. — House Moves to Slash Legal Aid Funding as Senate Proposes Increase, SALSA Makes Plea for Giving, Texas Tech Tops ABA Competition and More
  • JCPenney Estate, Jackson Walker Reach Potential $1.4M Settlement
  • SDTX Bankruptcy Court Scandal Timeline
  • Litigation-Financing Firms to Battle in Arbitration Over Alleged Trade Secrets and Breach of Contract Violations

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.