• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Dallas Firm Scores Latest Baby Powder Win Against J&J with $40M Verdict

October 1, 2019 Natalie Posgate

A Los Angeles jury on Friday handed a $40 million win to a California woman diagnosed with mesothelioma in the latest talcum powder trial brought against Johnson & Johnson. 

After six days of deliberation, the jury ruled that Johnson & Johnson baby powder products used by 71-year-old Nancy Cabibi was defective because it contained asbestos and that it caused Cabibi’s mesothelioma. The jury also determined Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately Cabibi and other users of the contaminants in its baby powder products. 

The jury awarded Cabibi and her husband, Phil, $1 million in economic damages and $39 million in noneconomic damages. 

The ruling is just the latest win against J&J for Dallas law firm Simon Greenstone Panatier, which has secured two other multimillion-dollar verdicts for mesothelioma plaintiffs exposed to asbestos while using Johnson’s Baby Powder. 

Earlier this month, name partner Chris Panatier won a $37.3 million verdict against Johson & Johnson in its home state of New Jersey. And in May, Panatier and David Greenstone won a $25.75 million verdict for an Oregon woman in another California court. 

“Nancy Cabibi was fighting to survive every single day because of asbestos in Johnson’s Baby Powder,” said Greenstone, who represented Cabibi in the current case. “While we are pleased with this verdict, we know that we must continue to fight on behalf of the Cabibis and so many others who have been harmed.”

Other attorneys at the Simon Greenstone firm on Cabibis’ case included Stuart Purdy and Marissa Langoff. 

A group of Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.-based attorneys from Kirkland & Ellis including Kimberly Branscome, Jay Bhimani and F. Chad Morriss represented Johnson & Johnson at trial. They declined comment. 

Natalie Posgate

Natalie Posgate covers pro bono work, public service and diversity within the Texas legal community.

View Natalie’s articles

Email Natalie

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • P.S. — Attorneys Serving the Community Raises More Than $586K for POETIC, Voting Rights Act Commemorated
  • Houston Texans Associate GC Jumps to Munsch Hardt
  • Victims’ Families Urge Rejection of Boeing 737 Max Settlement, Request Special Prosecutor
  • Juneteenth Reading Recommendations from Half Price Books
  • DOBS Scores $8M Verdict in J&J Talc Trial

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.