• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

ETP Demands $915 Million from Enterprise

April 22, 2014 Mark Curriden

© 2014 The Texas Lawbook.

By Mark Curriden, JD
Senior Writer for The Texas Lawbook

(April 22) –Energy Transfer Partners is asking a judge to award it $914.6 million for damages it suffered over an alleged joint venture with Houston-based Enterprise Products Partners that failed in 2011.

A Dallas jury ruled in March that Dallas-based ETP and Enterprise formed a partnership in an effort to jointly build a pipeline from Cushing, Okla., to the Gulf Coast and that Enterprise violated the partnership when it decided to walk away from its plans with ETP in order to do a more lucrative project with another competitor.

Mike Lynn
Mike Lynn
The jury found that Enterprise’s actions caused ETP to suffer $319.4 million in damages, which is believed to be the largest jury award ever issued in Dallas state courts.

In court documents filed Tuesday, ETP lawyer Mike Lynn asked Dallas District Judge Emily Tobolowsky to order Enterprise to pay the energy giant the $319.4 million. But Lynn demands an additional $595.2 million from Enterprise because the jury also found as part of its verdict that Enterprise received that amount in improper benefits as a result of its breach of duty with ETP.

Lawyers for ETP and Enterprise declined to comment. Judge Tobolowsky is expected to hear arguments on the damage award in the next month.

Enterprise argues that it never had a legally binding partnership with ETP and that it shouldn’t have to pay a dime in damages.

© 2014 The Texas Lawbook. Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Holland & Knight’s Recent Lateral Partner Additions Strengthen RE, Financial Services Offerings
  • Susman Godfrey Leads Lawsuit by ABA Against Trump Administration
  • CDT Roundup: The Streak Ends, But It’s Not All Quiet as Key Deals Still Stirring
  • Toyota Motor North America Names New GC, Compliance Officer
  • Anatomy of an Acquittal — Delayed Vindication

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.