• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Federal Circuit Denies Nintendo’s Appeal of iLife’s Patent

December 28, 2017 Natalie Posgate

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has denied Nintendo of America’s appeal of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s validation of a motion detection patent that led to a $10.1 million jury verdict against the gaming giant earlier this year.

A Dallas jury determined Aug. 31 that Nintendo had infringed on a Dallas-based technology firm’s ‘796 patent for use in Nintendo’s Wii gaming consoles. The technology firm, iLife Technologies, filed suit against Nintendo in 2013 on patent infringement claims.

The litigation faced a significant hurdle after Nintendo asked the USPTO to review the ‘796 patent in hopes of invalidating it; but the patent survived that review, which allowed iLife to proceed to trial.

“The patent office agreed to hear Nintendo’s opinion, but ultimately ruled in favor of iLife, concluding that iLife was the first to invent the motion detection technology at issue,” said Munck Wilson Mandala managing partner Bill Munck, who represented iLife when it wrote the ‘796 patent.

In its opinion issued Wednesday, the Federal Circuit denied Nintendo’s appeal and affirmed the USPTO’s “holding that all of the challenged claims were supported by the written description of the original application.”

Munck called the Federal Circuit’s ruling an “appellate victory” and said it “is another great result for our client, iLife Technologies, and the inventor of the technology, Mike Lehrman.”

Munck Wilson also represented iLife, which has been a firm client for two decades, at trial. The trial team was led by partner Mike Wilson and included Wallace Dunwoody, Shain Khoshbin, Jake LaCombe, Dan Venglarik, Jordan Strauss and Aaron Dilbeck. All are based in the firm’s Dallas office.

To read more about the trial, read The Texas Lawbook’s previous article here.

Natalie Posgate

Natalie Posgate covers pro bono work, public service and diversity within the Texas legal community.

View Natalie’s articles

Email Natalie

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Report: Judge Gilstrap Again the King of Patent Litigation
  • Atma Kabad Moves from Kirkland to Gibson Dunn
  • V&E, Susman Godfrey Alums Launch Litigation Finance Firm
  • Diamondback/Viper to Acquire Sitio Royalties for $4.1B
  • Legislature Revives 25% Judicial Pay Hike After Frantic Negotiations

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.