• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Houston Judge Rejects Class Action Status in $35M Case Against AT&T

September 26, 2018 Mark Curriden

AT&T’s winning streak in federal court continues.

A federal judge in Houston has refused to grant class action certification to a lawsuit claiming that hundreds of property owners between Dallas and Houston were contaminated by 200 miles of coaxial cable buried 70 years ago by AT&T.

U.S. District Judge Alfred H. Bennett ruled Tuesday that the lawsuit filed by prominent Houston trial attorney Tony Buzbee against the Dallas-based telecomm giant lacked “commonality” of issues and damages and does not qualify for class action status.

David McAtee

The lawsuit, Kenneth Cook, et al, v. AT&T Corp., claims that the coaxial cable that AT&T placed underground “is deteriorating and leaking lead and copper onto plaintiffs’ properties.” The suit says the cable is polluting the property. Buzbee sought to have the class action case to include all people and companies owning property between Houston and Dallas with the AT&T cable under its ground. He sought $35 million in damages.

In an 11-page decision, Judge Bennett found that the questions of law and fact – such as whether individual properties have actually been contaminated – were not common enough among the hundreds of potential members of the proposed class.

“Highly individualized issues of both causation and damages that predominate over common issues make class certification inappropriate,” Judge Bennett wrote. “Class action is not the proper vehicle to resolve this case.”

AT&T is represented in the case by Haynes and Boone partner Thad Behrens of Dallas. Mark Trachtenberg, a partner in the Houston office of Haynes and Boone, and associates Michelle Jacobs and Billy Marsh also worked on the matter for AT&T. David McAtee, AT&T’s general counsel, is a former partner at Haynes and Boone.

This is AT&T’s third big courtroom victory in the past four months. In August, a federal judge dismissed most of the Federal Trade Commission’s $4 billion false advertising case against AT&T. In June, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. rejected the U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust case seeking to block AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Winter Storm Uri Victims Ask SCOTX to Reinstate Their Claims
  • Flowserve, Chart Industries Agree to Combine in $19B Merger
  • New UT Law Grads Make Courtroom Debut in Federal Appeals Arguments
  • Bracewell Partner Becomes Shareholder in Greenberg Traurig’s Houston, New York Offices
  • Legislation Aims to Boost Texas as a Friendly Place to Incorporate and Settle Disputes

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.