• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Insurer Must Cover Landry’s in Credit Card Hack, Appellate Court Rules

July 22, 2021 Bruce Tomaso

The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an insurance company must defend Landry’s, the Houston-based restaurant chain, in litigation stemming from a data breach that resulted in personal information being skimmed from millions of customers’ credit cards.

The appellate court, in an opinion issued Thursday, overturned a federal district court ruling dismissing all claims by Landry’s against its insurer, the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (ICSOP). 

Landry’s had argued that ICSOP was bound to defend it in a lawsuit stemming from a cybersecurity breach at 14 Landry’s locations from May 2014 to December 2015. A program installed without authorization on payment-processing devices of Landry’s resulted, according to the appellate ruling, in the retrieval of “data from credit cards’ magnetic strips… including the cardholder’s name, card number, expiration date, and internal verification code.” The appellate ruling added, “At least some of that credit-card information was used to make unauthorized charges.”

Landry’s was sued by a third-party vendor, Paymentech, a branch of JPMorgan Chase Bank, which processes Visa and MasterCard payments to merchants. Paymentech, according to the appellate order, argued that “Landry’s was on the hook for the losses assessed by Visa and MasterCard” as a result of the security breach. ICSOP argued that it was not bound to defend Landry’s in that litigation. The Fifth Circuit Court disagreed and remanded the matter to the district court for resolution.

Laura Foggan, a partner in the Washington office of Crowell & Moring representing ICSOP, declined to comment on the appellate court’s ruling.

Andrew Guthrie, a partner with Haynes and Boone in Dallas who represents Landry’s, could not be reached for comment.

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Legislation Lowers Threshold Amount, Expands Jurisdiction of Business Court
  • Fifth Circuit’s SCOTUS Report Card: 3-8 This Term
  • Willkie Adds Blake Winburne to its Houston Office
  • Latham, Hunton AK Advise Chipmaker Wolfspeed in Chapter 11
  • Litigation Roundup: SpaceX Gets Win at SCOTX

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.