• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Judge Issues TRO Against Trump EO Targeting Susman Godfrey

April 15, 2025 Mark Curriden

Describing President Donald Trump’s executive order against Susman Godfrey as a “personal vendetta” and a “shocking abuse of power,” a federal judge Tuesday issued a temporary restraining order preventing critical provisions of the EO from being enforced.

U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan said President Trump’s order issued last Wednesday against the Houston-based litigation firm almost certainly violates the First and Fifth Amendments’ free speech, freedom of association and due process clauses.

The TRO is necessary, the judge ruled, because the executive order threatened the “very existence” of the law firm.

“I think the framers of our constitution would see this as a shocking abuse,” Judge AliKhan stated. “The government is purely trying to control what private lawyers may do, which I do not think will withstand constitutional scrutiny.”

The judge said she admires Susman Godfrey for “standing up” to the White House and fighting instead of cutting a deal with the Trump Administration as other large corporate law firms have done out of “coercion.” 

Throughout the hearing, the federal government’s lead lawyer, Deputy Associate Attorney General Richard Lawson, struggled to explain even basic reasonings for President Trump’s executive order against Susman Godfrey.

Judge AliKhan is the third federal judge to issue a TRO preventing executive orders by the president against law firms from taking effect. Other judges have issued rulings that presidential EOs against Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale are likely unconstitutional and should be put on ice. 

“Like Perkins, Jenner, and Wilmer before it, Susman is facing an imminent risk of losing clients, finding the doors to government buildings barred and scheduled meetings with government personnel cancelled, and having its ability to advocate for its clients severely curtailed,” the Susman Godfrey TRO petition filed Monday states. “The equities and public interest also tilt decisively in favor of immediate relief. Although Susman faces imminent constitutional, reputational, and economic injuries, the government would suffer no injury if prevented from implementing this unconstitutional order while its constitutionality is litigated.”

Susman Godfrey is represented in the lawsuit by lawyers from Munger, Tolles & Olson. 

The case is Susman Godfrey v. The Executive Office of the President, U.S. District Court of Washington, D.C., Case No. 1:25—cv—01107.


Related coverage

  • Susman Godfrey Seeks TRO Against Trump Administration
  • Susman Godfrey: President Trump ‘is Abusing the Powers of His Office … in Retaliation Against Organizations and People He Dislikes’
  • Four Law Firms in Texas Cut Deal with White House
  • Nine Texas Litigation Firms Sign Amicus Brief in Opposition to Presidential EOs
  • Texas AG Sends Piggyback Demands to Law Firms on DEI Info
  • Paul Weiss: Competitor Law Firms Came for Our Clients, Not to Help Us

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • What Two Former Texas U.S. Attorney’s Office Heads Want Business Leaders to Know About DOJ Corporate Enforcement in 2025
  • Legendary Trial Lawyer H. Lee Godfrey Dies
  • Fisher Phillips Hires Reed Smith Partner to be Regional Managing Partner in Houston
  • Gibson Dunn Partner Launches Solo Dallas Firm to ‘Reengineer Litigation Models for Businesses’
  • CDT Roundup: Another Week for the $20B Streak, Unusual Deals and a SPAC Twist

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.