• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

SEC’s FWRO Leads $650M Crypto-Related Pyramid Scheme Litigation

August 12, 2024 Mark Curriden

Led by lawyers in its Fort Worth office, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission brought charges Monday against the owners, employees and promoters of a $650 million crypto asset company that the federal agency claims was actually a multi-level marketing scheme that defrauded more than 200,000 investors, including many in Texas.

In a 55-page federal complaint filed in the Southern District of Florida, the SEC accuses a Florida couple — Cynthia and Eddy Petion — the company that they founded, NovaTech Ltd., and a half-dozen other defendants who promoted the investments with seven counts of violating federal securities laws by “marketing the NovaTech investment to investors who were inexperienced in crypto assets and who wanted to participate in the crypto markets.”

The scheme, which operated from 2019 to 2023, targeted the Haitian-American community. The defendants, according to the SEC, lured investors through claims that NovaTech would invest their funds in crypto asset and foreign exchange markets. 

Cynthia Petion assured investors that their investments would be safe and promised that they would “profit from day one, because again you have access to that capital.”

The lawsuit led by SEC trial lawyer Pat Disbennett of the Fort Worth Regional Office claims that the defendants, who mostly operated in Florida, made solicitations through its public website, social media and network of promoters.

Disbennett, who is a former partner at Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann and joined the SEC a year ago, wrote in the complaint that NovaTech “made a barrage of false and misleading statements,” including a commitment to pay profits to investors from this trading activity on a weekly basis and reported average returns of 2 percent or more each week.

“In reality, NovaTech appears to have traded only a small fraction of investor assets, it suffered significant trading losses, and it had no other known sources of revenues besides investor deposits,” the SEC complaint states. “In other words, NovaTech was a pyramid scheme that depended on the recruitment of new investors or new investments from existing investors to fund its enterprise.”

“The Petions misappropriated investor assets for unauthorized purposes, including transferring millions of dollars of commingled investor assets to themselves,” the SEC claims. “On information and belief, they also used investor funds to make payments to existing investors and commission payments to promoters.”

The SEC alleges that the scheme collapsed around May 2023 after “investors experienced withdrawal delays and regulators in several U.S. states and Canadian provinces took action against, or issued fraud warnings about, NovaTech and the Petions.”

In court documents, the SEC states that the Petions lived in Florida but are now living in Panama.

“NovaTech and the Petions caused untold losses to tens of thousands of victims around the world,” said Eric Werner, director of the SEC’s Fort Worth Regional Office. “As we allege, MLM schemes of this size require promoters to fuel them, and today’s action demonstrates that we will hold accountable not just the principal architects of these massive schemes, but also promoters who spread their fraud by unlawfully soliciting victims.”

The SEC’s complaint alleges that NovaTech’s top promoters, Martin Zizi, Dapilinu Dunbar, James Corbett, Corrie Sampson, John Garofano and Marsha Hadley, each recruited a wide network of investors and promoters even though they “became aware of certain red flags about NovaTech, including regulatory actions taken against it by U.S. and Canadian regulators, they continued recruiting investors and downplayed the red flags.” 

The defense lawyers include Dwight E. Jefferson of Grealish & McZeal in Houston representing Dunbar and Sampson, Alina Veneziano of Oberheiden PC in Houston advising Garofano, David R. Chase of Fort Lauderdale representing Zizi, and William Grausso of Bohemia, New York, counseling Corbett.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Catherine Rowsey, Todd Baker and Jamie Haussecker of the Fort Worth Regional Office, with assistance from Sejal Bhakta of the Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit, under the supervision of Nikolay Vydashenko and B. David Fraser. 

The case is Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nova Tech LTD, SDFL, No. 24-cv-23058.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Shell US Lawyers Adam MacLuckie and Huyen Luong Have a ‘Need to be an Ally’
  • Womble Adds Veteran Biz Litigator in its Houston Office
  • Gibbs & Bruns Notches 2 Trial Wins in 2 Days
  • Lawbook 50 — The Texas Magnificent Seven
  • Federal Court Strikes Down FDA’s LDT Final Rule — Implications for Clinical Laboratories

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.