• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Southwest Airlines to Pay One Cent, Legal Fees to Settle Lawsuit Over Cancelled Hispanic Student Program

May 27, 2025 Krista Torralva

Southwest Airlines will pay one cent in nominal damages to a politically conservative activist group to end litigation over Southwest’s now-discontinued charitable flight program for low-income Hispanic students, a U.S. district judge in Dallas ordered Thursday. 

Senior U.S. District Judge Sidney Fitzwater previously issued an order signaling his intention to award Edward Blum’s American Alliance for Equal Rights nominal damages of one cent and require the Dallas-based airline to pay reasonable legal fees and court costs after Southwest offered what the judge described as an “unconditional surrender” to all the relief sought by AAER. 

On Wednesday, lawyers for both parties filed a joint response stating they would not oppose the judge’s plan. The lawyers also stated they had reached a confidential settlement on the amount of attorney fees and other costs to be paid by Southwest.

Last month, lawyers for Southwest asked the judge to enter a judgment ordering the airline to pay one cent — the amount in damages the AAER had sought — and reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees to end the litigation. Southwest discontinued the program called “¡Lánzate!” — meaning “Take off!” — after AAER sued Southwest on behalf of a white student and an Asian student who claimed they were illegally denied the program’s benefits.  

Before the judge signaled his intent to end the lawsuit, AAER accused Southwest of trying to sidestep liability for violating federal discrimination law and urging the judge to decide the case on its merits. 

But the judge wrote in his May 14 opinion that forgoing the merits “is an appropriate exercise of inherent authority because Southwest has unconditionally surrendered, and the entry of such judgment would grant Alliance total victory.” 

The case is American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Southwest Airlines, Northern District of Texas, Case No. 3:24-CV-1209.

The AAER is represented by Cameron T. Norris, Thomas R. McCarthy, Steven D. Begakis and R. Gabriel Anderson of Consovoy McCarthy and Adam K. Mortara of Lawfair. 

Southwest Airlines is represented by Tristan Morales, Kimberly Williams and Anton Metlitsky of O’Melveny & Myers.

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • SCOTX Sides With Southwest Pilots Union in Boeing Suit
  • Judge Weighs Sanctions, Dismissal Motion in Pioneer Natural Resources Suit
  • Former TV News Anchor Guilty in $300M Pandemic Loan Scam
  • No Texas Jurisdiction Over Foreign Airplane Engine Maker, SCOTX Says
  • P.S. — Attorneys Serving the Community Raises More Than $586K for POETIC, Voting Rights Act Commemorated

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.