• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

St. Mary Cemetery Trial Ends in Hung Jury

July 20, 2015 Mark Curriden

© 2015 The Texas Lawbook.

By Kerry Curry

(July 20) – A dispute over a landowner’s actions at an historic African-American cemetery south of Dallas remains unresolved after a judge ruled the case a mistrial on Friday.

An Ellis County jury was unable to agree whether a landowner and his company were negligent in their actions at St. Mary Cemetery located in rural Ellis County, south of Dallas.

cemeteryL

The cemetery is believed to be about 150 years old and is situated on land that was once the Tarrant plantation. Its graves date to the late 1880s and include some of the county’s early inhabitants, including slaves owned by Edward H. Tarrant, the namesake of Tarrant County. One unmarked grave is believed to be that of Willoughby Rankin, a slave of Frederick Harrison Rankin, who was one of Stephen F. Austin’s old 300 colonists. In addition, the grandmother of George Brown, the first African-American mayor of Waxahachie, is buried at the cemetery.

The 2014 lawsuit pitted Irving-based Creek Land and Cattle and its owner, Blair Dance, against the St. Mary Cemetery Association, which represents the descendants of people buried at the cemetery. Elmerine Bell, a resident of Italy, Texas and a retired Dallas schoolteacher, acted as lead plaintiff for the cemetery association.

“Of course I’m disappointed, but I feel we did the best we could,” Bell said. “We had overwhelming evidence. Our attorney did a phenomenal job. I think the judge was fair in letting in the majority of the testimony that we wanted.”

Bell said one of the jurors contacted her after the trial and expressed a desire to tour the cemetery, and Bell accompanied her to St. Mary Cemetery over the weekend.

“She was appalled that the jury didn’t come back with a verdict in our favor,” Bell said.

The cemetery association alleged that Dance and his company removed undergrowth on the cemetery grounds, leveled land where unmarked graves were located and adjusted the boundaries of the cemetery with a new chain-link fence that they allege encroaches onto cemetery property—resulting in unmarked graves outside the fence and underneath land that is being farmed.

Dance’s company bought 293 acres of land in rural Ellis County, which included the cemetery, in 2010. The alleged damage occurred in March 2012.

Adam Sanderson, one of the defense attorneys and a partner with Dallas business litigation firm Reese Gordon Marketos, was surprised by the hung jury.

Adam Sanderson
Adam Sanderson
“I expected them to come back and find in favor of Blair Dance,” Sanderson said.

“He is a landowner who saw the need to replace an old barbed wire fence around a cemetery and that is what he did, but I’m not surprised (on the mistrial) in the sense that the jury couldn’t agree on awarding any damages to the plaintiff. I don’t think we’ll ever go back to trial again on this matter.”

The defendants were also represented by Joel Reese of the same firm; Frank Boyles of Irving and Clay Hinds of Waxahachie.

Craig Albert, a partner in the Dallas law firm of Cherry Petersen Landry Albert, represented the plaintiffs.

Craig Albert
Craig Albert
Nine of 12 jurors believed Creek Land and Cattle was negligent, according to jury polling after the mistrial, Albert said. Plaintiffs needed at least 10 of 12 jurors to agree to reach a verdict. The jury did not address the second question in the jury charge, the awarding of damages, because they weren’t able to get 10 jurors to agree on the first question of negligence.

The jury charge did not allow the jury to address the dispute over the boundary line, nor did it allow for the awarding of attorney’s fees.

The three jurors who didn’t agree on negligence felt like they didn’t have enough evidence to prove negligence, Albert said.

The case will be reset for trial for early 2016, but it’s possible the two sides will re-enter settlement talks, Albert said.

© 2015 The Texas Lawbook. Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Sarah T. Hughes Diversity Scholarship on Pause, Bar None Fundraiser Canceled
  • Phillips 66’s Kathleen Bertolatus is ‘the Full Package’
  • Premium Subscriber Q&A: Kathleen Bertolatus
  • Bracewell’s Jeff Vaden Weighs in on White-Collar Trends and their Texas Impact
  • Houston Crane Co. Slammed with $640M Verdict Over Construction Site Fatality 

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.