The State Bar of Texas has released its May disciplinary report, which includes three disbarments, 11 suspensions, three public reprimands and six resolutions of disciplinary appeals.
The complaints cut across a wide swath of the state with two each from Austin and El Paso, three each from Dallas and Houston and five from San Antonio – not to mention a sprinkling from Amarillo and the Lower Valley.
Aside from standard infractions of case inattention and inappropriate political endorsements, breaches of the canons cited by the bar’s disciplinary panels this month also include ticket-fixing, money-laundering, wire fraud, theft and income tax evasion.
JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE
Rudy Madrid, County Judge (Kleberg County)
On April 3, 2019, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct issued a public warning to Rudy Madrid, county judge in Kingsville, Kleberg County.
Judge Madrid was accused of “continuously and blatantly” endorsing a candidate for county commissioner, evidenced by a photo of the candidate on his Facebook page. In response, Judge Madrid said that he had simply “liked” a photo that he was tagged in but had taken the photo down after two weeks when he became aware of the complaint and that the presence of the photo was a likely ethics violation. The picture was one of two men, including Judge Madrid, holding a large campaign sign promoting the county commissioner candidacy of Chuck Schultz. Judge Madrid and the other man are seen giving the “thumbs up” sign.
The State Commission on Judicial Ethics concluded that the judge had “lent the prestige of his office to advance the private interests” of the local candidate. The commission also concluded that the presence of the photo amounted to a political endorsement of the candidate and issued a public warning of his violation of Canons 2B and 5(2) of the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct.
James Oakley, County Judge (Burnet County)
On April 24, 2019, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct issued a public admonition to James Oakley, county judge in Burnet, Burnet County.
Judge Oakley’s likeness and written endorsement appeared on a handbill promoting the candidacy of Donna Holland Wilcox as a commissioner for the Pedernales Electric Cooperative. The PEC is a public non-profit electric cooperative, and Judge Oakley was determined to have violated the Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 5(2): “A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others.” The Commission determined that he should be publicly admonished for the violation.
Judge Oakley has said he will appeal the determination.
Mike Trejo, Justice of the Peace (Cameron County)
On April 26, 2019, the State Commission on Judicial Conduct issued a public reprimand and order of additional education to Mike Trejo, justice of the peace, precinct 5, place 3 in La Feria, Cameron County
In complaints filed by two former clerks, Trejo was accused of routinely dismissing, or causing to be dismissed, traffic citations for family, friends and political supporters. In a subsequent investigation by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Trejo was found to have repeatedly dismissed as many as nine traffic-related cases against specific individuals identified as friends and family of the judge, particularly those presented by a musician named Fruity Villareal, a local celebrity and supporter of the judge. Investigators also found cases routinely dismissed by local prosecutors that were tagged as having been quashed “in the interest of justice” at the judge’s request.
When questioned, Trejo denied dismissing cases routinely, but said he was unaware that doing so would be a violation of judicial conduct. The commission concluded that Judge Trejo “failed to follow the law and exhibited incompetence” by routinely causing the dismissal of citations that would have otherwise been prosecuted in his court. He was ordered to undergo 20 hours of mentoring in addition to his required annual continuing judicial education.
DISCIPLINARY APPEALS
Derrick Duane Cornejo (Denver, Colorado)
On April 16, 2019, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed a judgment of suspension against Denver, Colorado, attorney Derrick Duane Cornejo [#24048049], 48. On June 26, 2015, the Colorado Supreme Court entered an amended order and notice of suspension in a matter styled Complainant: The People of the State of Colorado, respondent: Derrick Duane Cornejo, #29438, Case Number 13PDJ066, and suspended Cornejo from the practice of law for 18 months for his violation of Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct 3.4(c) [knowingly disobey an order of a tribunal], 5.5(a)(1) [practice law without a license], and 8.4(c) [dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation]. BODA Cause No. 61814.
Patrick Lanier (Austin)
On April 9, 2019, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed an order dismissing compulsory discipline against Austin attorney Patrick Lanier [#11933500], 70. On March 25, 2015, Lanier was found guilty of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and 1349, 13 counts of wire fraud in violation of l8 U.S.C. § 1343, one count of harboring and concealing a person from arrest in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1071, and one count of assisting a federal offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3, intentional crimes as defined in the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, in the case styled United States of America v. Patrick Lanier, Cause No. 4:10CR00258-004, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.
Lanier was sentenced to prison for 204 months on each of the wire fraud counts and 22 months on the remaining counts to run concurrently and ordered to pay restitution of $37,544,944.16. On January 2, 2018, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated two counts, affirmed the remainder, and remanded it to the trial court for sentencing. On March 26, 2019, the Supreme Court of Texas accepted Lanier’s resignation in lieu of discipline by Misc. Docket No. 19-9019 and canceled his license to practice law. BODA Cause No. 57700.
Julie Ann Castillo (San Antonio)
On April 16, 2019, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed a judgment of suspension against San Antonio attorney Julie Ann Castillo [#24092232], 31. On February 27, 2018, Castillo pleaded guilty to conspiracy to prepare false federal income tax returns in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, an intentional crime as defined in the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, in the case styled United States of America v. Julie Ann Lopez, Aliases: Lopez, Julie; Lopez Julie A.; Castillo, Julie A, Cause No. 5:16-CR-00239-FB(2), U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Castillo was placed on probation for five years and ordered to pay restitution of $91,220. Castillo is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Texas for the term of her criminal probation. BODA Cause No. 61643.
Juan R. Rodriguez (Pearland)
On April 16, 2019, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed a judgment of suspension against Pearland attorney Juan R. Rodriguez [#24055914], 41. On November 28, 2018, Rodriguez pleaded guilty to theft of property greater than $100 and less than $750, an intentional crime as defined in the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, in the case styled The State of Texas v. Juan Rodriguez, Cause No. 234991 in the County Court at Law No. 1 in Brazoria County, Texas. By an order of deferred adjudication, the court placed him on community supervision for 12 months. He was ordered to pay restitution of $682.23 and a fine of $400. Rodriguez is suspended from the practice of law in the state of Texas for the term of his community supervision. BODA Cause No. 61642.
Kasey Cathryn Krummel (Dallas)
On April 29, 2019, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed a judgment of indefinite disability suspension of Dallas attorney Kasey Cathryn Krummel [#24097957], 32. BODA Cause No. 60731.
Marco A. Delgado (El Paso)
On April 22, 2019, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals signed a judgment of disbarment against El Paso attorney Marco A. Delgado [#00796001], 52.
On or about January 24, 2014, Delgado was convicted of conspiracy to commit money laundering, an intentional crime as defined in the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, and sentenced to incarceration for 240 months in United States of America v. Marco Antonio Delgado, Case No. EP-12-CR-2106-DB, in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, El Paso Division. Delgado appealed his criminal conviction. During the pendency of his appeal, on July 30, 2014, the board signed an interlocutory order of suspension. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and issued its mandate on January 31, 2019. BODA Cause No. 54396.
DISBARMENTS
Pascual Madrigal (San Antonio)
On March 15, 2019, Pascual Madrigal [#12802150], 64, of San Antonio, was disbarred. An evidentiary panel of the District 10 Grievance Committee found that Madrigal failed to respond to a grievance in a timely manner. Madrigal violated Rule 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $4,910.66 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
On April 30, 2019, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction the appeal of San Antonio attorney Pascual Madrigal [#12802150], 64, from a judgment of active suspension signed on August 22, 2018, by an evidentiary panel of the District 10 Grievance Committee of the State Bar of Texas in Case Nos. 201700545, 201703331, and 20170431. On March 15, 2019, Madrigal was disbarred by the same evidentiary panel in Case Nos. 201703589 and 201704251. The judgment of disbarment is now final, and the Board of Disciplinary Appeals no longer has jurisdiction over this appeal. BODA Cause No. 61008.
Linda Alice Brandmiller (San Antonio)
On March 26, 2019, Linda Alice Brandmiller [#24043566], 60, of San Antonio, accepted a two-year fully probated suspension effective June 1, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 12 Grievance Committee found that Brandmiller failed to communicate with clients, failed to maintain clients’ funds in a trust account, and practiced law under an improper trade name. Brandmiller violated Rules 1.03(a), 1.03(b), 1.14(a), 7.01(a), 7.01(f), and 7.02(a)(1). She was ordered to pay $1,000 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Samuel Adjei Sarfo (Austin)
On February 21, 2019, Samuel Adjei Sarfo [#24071896], 56, of Austin, received a judgment of disbarment. The 201st Civil District Court of Travis County found that Sarfo violated Rule 8.04(a)(7) [a lawyer shall not violate any disciplinary or disability order or judgment] and Rule 8.04(a)(11) (a lawyer shall not engage in the practice of law when the lawyer is on inactive status or when the lawyer’s right to practice has been suspended or
terminated).
Sarfo was ordered to pay $11,673.59 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses. Sarfo has filed a notice of appeal.
SUSPENSIONS
Edgardo Rafael Baez (San Antonio)
On April 16, 2019, Edgardo Rafael Baez [#24048334], 48, of San Antonio, accepted a 28-month fully probated suspension effective April 22, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 10 Grievance Committee found that Baez accepted a legal matter beyond his competence, failed to keep his client reasonably informed, and failed to promptly render a full accounting regarding the client’s funds. Baez violated Rules 1.01(a)(1), 1.03(b), and 1.14(b). He was ordered to pay $1,512.50 in restitution and $800 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Charles Stephen Cantu (Arlington)
On February 25, 2019, Charles Stephen Cantu [#24044911], 41, of Arlington, received a three-year fully probated suspension effective February 14, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 7 Grievance Committee found that Cantu neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of a legal matter, and failed to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Upon termination of representation, Cantu failed to take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect his client’s interests and failed to timely furnish a response to the grievance. Cantu violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.03(a), 1.15(d), and 8.04(a)(8). He was ordered to pay $7,540 in restitution, $2,351 in attorneys’ fees, and $687 in direct expenses.
Brian Anthony Hamner (San Antonio)
On April 11, 2019, Brian Anthony Hamner [#24041050], 43, of San Antonio, agreed to a four-year fully probated suspension effective March 27, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 10 Grievance Committee found that Hamner violated the terms of a prior disciplinary judgment. Hamner violated Rules 8.04(a)(7) and 8.04(a)(10). He was ordered to pay $800 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Larrisha Charlie Vaughn Jackson (Houston)
On March 7, 2019, Larrisha Charlie Vaughn Jackson [#24073658], 31, of Houston, accepted a three-year fully probated suspension effective April 1, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that in one matter, Jackson neglected the legal matter entrusted to her and failed to surrender papers and property to which her client was entitled. In a second matter, Jackson failed to keep funds belonging in part to her client in a separate trust account and failed to promptly deliver to third persons funds that the third persons were entitled to receive. Jackson violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.14(a), 1.14(b), and 1.15(d). She was ordered to pay $2,860.50 in restitution and $1,928.29 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Dallas E. McKibben (Amarillo)
On March 25, 2019, Dallas E. McKibben [#24028450], 42, of Amarillo, received a nine-month fully probated suspension effective March 15, 2019. An investigatory panel of the District 13 Grievance Committee found that in September 2017, McKibben was appointed to represent the complainant in a criminal matter. During McKibben’s representation of the complainant, McKibben failed to keep the complainant reasonably informed about the status of his criminal matter and failed to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information from the complainant about his criminal matter. McKibben violated Rule 1.03(a). He was ordered to pay $675 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Selvino Padilla Jr. (McAllen)
On April 24, 2019, Selvino Padilla Jr. [#15406250], 64, of McAllen, accepted an 18-month fully probated suspension effective May 1, 2019. The 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County found that Padilla violated Rule 5.03(a) [a lawyer having direct supervisory authority over the non-lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the person’s conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer]. Padilla was ordered to pay $10,000 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses. On April 2, 2019, Tanika J. Solomon [#24057713], 47, of Houston, accepted a sixmonth fully probated suspension effective April 1, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that in one matter, Solomon failed to promptly deliver to her client’s medical providers funds that they were entitled to receive and failed to promptly render a full accounting regarding such funds. In three other matters, Solomon failed to keep her clients reasonably informed about the status of their legal matters and failed to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Solomon violated Rules 1.03(a) and 1.14(b). She was ordered to pay $1,400 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Marcus Raymond Spagnoletti (Houston)
On April 5, 2019, Marcus Raymond Spagnoletti [#24076708], 34, of Houston, accepted a two-year fully probated suspension effective May 1, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that in representing his clients, Spagnoletti neglected the legal matters entrusted to him, frequently failed to carry out com- pletely the obligations Spagnoletti owed to his clients, and failed to keep his clients reasonably informed about the status of their cases and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Spagnoletti violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.01(b)(2), and 1.03(a). He was ordered to pay $5,830 in attorneys’ fees.
Andrew David Vaughn (Canton)
On February 4, 2019, Andrew David Vaughn [#24056764], 38, of Canton, received a two-year fully probated suspension effective February 1, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 1 Grievance Committee found that Vaughn neglected a legal matter entrusted to him by failing to perform legal services. Vaughn violated Rule 1.01(b)(1). He was ordered to pay $2,400 in attorneys’ fees and $542.50 in direct expenses.
Jack Lee McGinnis II (Boerne)
On February 25, 2019, Jack Lee McGinnis II [#13630990], 53, of Boerne, received a 10-year partially probated suspension effective February 20, 2019, with the first two years actively served and the remainder probated. An evidentiary panel of the District 15 Grievance Committee found that McGinnis engaged in the practice of law while his law license was suspended and failed to respond to the grievance. McGinnis violated Rules 8.04(a)(8) and 8.04(a)(11). He was ordered to pay $705 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Charsalynn Gersan Mitchell (Dallas)
On April 11, 2019, Charsalynn Ger- San Mitchell [#24067771], 39, of Dallas, agreed to a 12-month partially probated suspension effective May 1, 2019, with the first month actively served and the remainder probated.
An evidentiary panel of the District 6 Grievance Committee found that beginning in 2015, Mitchell, while employed as an attorney with Legal Aid of NorthWest Texas, or LANWT, engaged in outside employment without disclosing such employment to LANWT and without LANWT’s required approval. Furthermore, Mitchell used and/or charged LANWT’s credit card and/or e-filing account multiple times, without LANWT’s knowledge, consent, or authorization, for filing fees associated with Mitchell’s private clients who were not clients of LANWT. Additionally, in November 2016, Mitchell misrepresented to a LANWT’s client that the client owed money to LANWT for reimbursement of a social study fee. Mitchell obtained a money order from the client and cashed it in Mitchell’s name.
Mitchell violated Rules 1.14(a) and 8.04(a)(3). She was ordered to pay $1,200 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
Julie Lynn Bulthuis Krenek (Frisco)
On April 16, 2019, Julie Lynn Bulthuis Krenek [#24065574], 50, of Frisco, agreed to a 12-month active suspension effective August 15, 2019. An evidentiary panel of the District 1 Grievance Committee found that Krenek failed to keep the complainant reasonably informed about the status of her legal matter and failed to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. Krenek failed to timely furnish to the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel a response or other information as required by the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure and did not in good faith timely assert a privilege or other legal ground for failure to do so. Krenek violated Rules 1.03(a) and 8.04(a)(8). She was ordered to pay $500 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
PUBLIC REPRIMANDS
Loren Craig Green (Arlington)
On March 25, 2019, Loren Craig Green [#24029179], 53, of Arlington, agreed to a public reprimand. An evidentiary panel of the District 7 Grievance Committee found that Green had direct supervisory authority over a non-lawyer and failed to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the non-lawyer’s conduct was compatible with the professional obligations of Green. Green shared fees with a non-lawyer. Green paid a person not licensed to practice law for referring clients or prospective clients to Green. The fees paid were not for advertising or public relation services rendered in accordance with Rule 7.03. The fees paid were not the usual charges of a lawyer referral service that meets the requirements of Occupational Code, Title 5, Subtitle B, Chapter 952. Green violated Rules 5.03(a), 5.04(a), and 7.03(b). He was ordered to pay $1,200 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.
William Albert Pigg (Dallas)
On April 22, 2019, William Albert Pigg [#24057009], 60, of Dallas, entered into an agreed judgment of public reprimand. An investigatory panel of the District 6 Grievance Committee found that Pigg, upon termination of representation, failed to take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect his client’s interests.
Pigg illegally shared legal fees with a non-lawyer and assisted a person who is not a member of the bar in the performance of activity that constitutes the unauthorized practice of law. Pigg is also subject to discipline based upon the conduct of a non-lawyer employee.
Jermaine Savoy Thomas (Houston)
On April 16, 2019, Jermaine Savoy Thomas [#24033386], 43, of Houston, accepted an agreed public reprimand. An evidentiary panel of the District 4 Grievance Committee found that Thomas neglected the legal matter entrusted to him and frequently failed to carry out completely the obligations he owed to his client. Thomas further failed to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of the case and failed to promptly comply with his client’s reasonable requests for information.
Additionally, Thomas failed to promptly deliver funds that his client’s medical providers were entitled to receive and failed to promptly render a full accounting of the settlement funds upon request. Thomas violated Rules 1.01(b)(1), 1.01(b)(2), 1.03(a), and 1.14(b). He was ordered to pay $500 in attorneys’ fees and direct expenses.