• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Susman, Litigation Funder Sued by Former Client for Loss

February 2, 2026 Alexa Shrake

Susman Godfrey and litigation funder Longford Capital face a lawsuit from an Irish patent monetization firm over a $37 million award.

The suit filed Thursday by Arigna Technology in Harris County claims arbitrators came to the $37 million award by corruption and fraud. The story was first reported by Bloomberg News.

Arigna hired Susman in August 2020 to enforce patents. The Houston-based firm obtained funding from Longford for the litigation.

Arigna claims a dispute arose between the parties in 2023 over how much Longford was owed from a multiparty settlement. The firm filed a complaint in Delaware federal court over Longford filing a first-priority lien on the settlement proceeds.

The case was moved to arbitration in June 2024. A final award of over $37 million was issued in July 2025 in Longford’s favor.

Arigna appealed the award, which the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services Appellate Panel dismissed last month.

Arigna stated it filed suit against Longford to vacate an arbitration decision that should never have issued.

“The relevant funding agreement was between Longford and Susman, not Arigna. Arigna should never have been in arbitration in the first place. As the suit makes clear, Longford’s claim in arbitration was an overreaching attempt to take money from companies it had no contractual relationship with and from law firms, investors, and cases it never funded,” Arigna said in a statement to The Texas Lawbook. “The award from the JAMS arbitrator (who was selected by Longford and Susman, not Arigna) was in error for numerous reasons.”

Arigna claims the JAMS Appellate Panel “improperly abandoned its duty to review” the award and upheld it without allowing any briefing or argument.

“Arigna is confident that this injustice will be set aside by a district court,” Arigna stated.

Neither Susman Godfrey nor JAMS immediately responded to a request for comment.

Counsel for the defendants has not filed appearances at this time.

Steven Callahan of Charhon Callahan Robson & Garza is representing Arigna.

The case is Arigna Technology Limited v. Longford Capital Fund III, 2026-05917.

Alexa Shrake

Alexa covers litigation and trials for The Texas Lawbook.

View Alexa’s articles

Email Alexa

©2026 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Litigation Roundup: DOJ Claims Jackson Walker Fee Deals Put Private Interest Over Public Trust
  • Susman, Litigation Funder Sued by Former Client for Loss
  • How Businesses Can Protect Insurance Claims After Winter Storm Fern
  • Coterra Energy to Merge with Devon Energy to Create $58B Shale Giant
  • Nine Energy Hires Kirkland and KRCL for Chapter 11 Restructuring

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2026 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.