• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Fifth Circuit Rules in Favor of NFL in Super Bowl Seating Case

September 12, 2016 Mark Curriden

© 2016 The Texas Lawbook.

By Natalie Posgate

(Sept. 12) – A federal appeals court has tossed out an appeal filed by football fans affected by the 2011 Super Bowl seating fiasco in Dallas who were unsatisfied with essentially every outcome of their lawsuit against the National Football League that went to trial last spring.

In a 25-page ruling filed Friday, a three-judge panel affirmed U.S. District Judge Barbara Lynn’s decision to dismiss the Dallas Cowboys from the litigation, deny class certification to the plaintiffs and dismiss multiple claims by the fans on summary judgment. The fans also appealed Lynn’s decision to grant the NFL’s motion for directed verdict that prevented the jury from deciding punitive damages.

The case was originally brought as a class action seeking more than $100 million in damages. After class certification was denied, the cases of seven individual plaintiffs proceeded to trial.

The jury rejected the plaintiffs’ claims of fraud and awarded seven fans a collective total of $76,000 on their breach of contract claims. Four of the seven plaintiffs received less than the NFL had offered them prior to trial, and the trial court awarded the NFL its post-offer costs on those claims. The seven remaining plaintiffs sought about $97,000 collectively at trial.

“We find no error in the district court’s 12(b)(6), Rule 56 and directed verdict rulings. We also hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying to give appellants’ proposed jury instruction,” Judge Edith Jones wrote in the Fifth Circuit opinion. “Finally, in denying class certification, the district court carefully applied the class certification principles to each class, and we agree with its conclusions.”

The panel also included Chief Judge Carl Stewart and Judge James Dennis.

Thad Behrens
Thad Behrens

“The NFL is pleased with the Fifth Circuit’s decision, which upheld the district court’s rulings in the NFL’s favor in all respects,” NFL lead counsel Thad Behrens of Haynes and Boone said in an emailed statement.

Michael Avenatti, who represents the plaintiffs, indicated in an email that his clients are not giving up their claims.

Michael Avenatti
Michael Avenatti

“We recovered over $10,000 per fan by taking the NFL to trial and holding them accountable,” Avenatti said. “If we would have never brought the case, the fans would have received a small fraction of that amount from the NFL. We will continue to try the cases on an individual basis in order to force the NFL to reimburse the fans what they are due. We should not have to proceed in this manner but we will. This is a marathon, not a sprint.”

The legal battle dates back to February 2011, when a winter storm caused the NFL to fail to complete the installment of temporary seats designed to fully accommodate the 103,219 Super Bowl spectators in time for the Feb. 6 Super Bowl XLV game.

As a result, around 850 fans were relocated to different seats, 450 fans did not receive seats at all and more than 1,450 fans had seats with an obstructed view of the field.

For more details on the case, find The Texas Lawbook’s in-depth reporting on the March 2015 trial here.

© 2016 The Texas Lawbook. Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Injured Man Gets $9.45M Jury Verdict Against Dallas Hotel
  • P.S. — Raising the Bar: Lawyers Fight Food Insecurity, Support Veterans and More 
  • Winter Storm Uri Victims Ask SCOTX to Reinstate Their Claims
  • Flowserve, Chart Industries Agree to Combine in $19B Merger
  • New UT Law Grads Make Courtroom Debut in Federal Appeals Arguments

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.