• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Trade Secrets Dispute Settles with Agreed Permanent Injunction on Eve of Trial

August 21, 2020 Natalie Posgate

A Houston federal court this week permanently enjoined OFS International (OFSi) from manufacturing and selling oilfield pipe connections as part of a settlement that the Houston-based oilfield services company reached with a competitor. 

The settlement abruptly ended what would have been a two-week bench trial starting Monday between OFSi and Tenaris, a Houston-based oilfield pipe manufacturer that alleged OFSi stole Tenaris’ trade secrets and designs for oilfield pipe connections in order to produce its own products. 

The order, entered Tuesday by U.S. Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan, permanently enjoins OFSi from manufacturing and selling six connections that OFSi said were based on confidential information OFSi allegedly stole from Tenaris subsidiary IPSCO Tubulars through a licensing agreement. OFSi had purchased a license to market IPSCO’s threaded connection products in exchange for a licensing fee. Tenaris was also pursuing breach of contract claims against OFSi before the settlement went through. 

“This was truly a breach of trust for one of a company’s licensees to take one’s product and develop their own using the licensor’s designs,” Baker Botts partner Ty Buthod, Tenaris’ lead attorney, told The Texas Lawbook.

Before the parties got hip-deep in settlement talks, Judge Bryan had paved the way for trial in an Aug. 4 ruling that denied OFSi’s summary judgment motion. In the same motion, she said she was skeptical that the plaintiffs could prove at trial that the design parameters of one of IPSCO’s products were trade secrets.

IPSCO originally initiated the litigation in June 2019, but Baker Botts did not get involved in the case until after Tenaris acquired IPSCO in January. 

Buthod called the settlement an “extraordinary outcome.”

“What’s unusual is that they agreed to a permanent injunction without us even having to go to trial to prove our case,” Buthod said.“We expected to be able to get an injunction, but an agreed injunction that is this broad is pretty extraordinary. On top of that, they have to pay us money too.”

But AZA partner Tim Shelby, OFSi’s lead attorney, also viewed the outcome as favorable.

“This is a great commercial result for OFSi,” Shelby told The Lawbook. “The terms of the settlement include a payment of only $700,000, which is less than half of OFSi’s legal fees to defend the case at trial. Given the current market conditions, this settlement made sense for OFSi. It does not include any findings of wrongdoing.”

Shelby added that as of last year, OFSi had already discontinued four out of the six products at issue in the permanent injunction and the remaining were going to be phased out. 

But Buthod emphasized that the permanent injunction — not the settlement amount — was the most important element of the outcome. 

“It’s disappointing to hear that a manufacturer that was caught misappropriating trade secrets suggested ‘no harm, no foul’ when they got caught,” he said. “It remains vitally important for Tenaris to protect its intellectual property and we are proud of having done so against people who chose to misappropriate it rather than compete fairly in the market.”

In addition to Buthod, the Baker Botts team representing Tenaris included Paul Elliott, Matt Sheridan and Brent Cooper. 

In addition to Shelby, the AZA team defending OFSi included Joe Ahmad, Jason McManis, Sammy Ford and Jordan Warshauer. 

Natalie Posgate

Natalie Posgate covers pro bono work, public service and diversity within the Texas legal community.

View Natalie’s articles

Email Natalie

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Judge Declares Trump EO Against Susman Godfrey Unconstitutional and Retaliatory
  • SCOTX Wipes Out $116M Judgment Against Werner in Fatal Crash Case 
  • Lease Operator Owns ‘Produced Water,’ SCOTX Says
  • SCOTX: Winter Storm Uri Lawsuits Seeking Billions of Dollars Narrowed But Still Alive
  • DNOW Acquires MRC for $1.5B

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.