The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week in a case where a group of about 75 Texas landowners are fighting to revive their lawsuit against the state seeking compensation for the repeated flooding of their property that they say is the result of a public highway project. The case came to the high court after a Fifth Circuit panel sided with the state and the court declined to rehear the case en banc over the dissent of five judges. The question the justices are tasked with answering in this case is:
“May a person whose property is taken without compensation seek redress under the self-executing Takings Clause even if the legislature has not affirmatively provided them with a cause of action?”
Eversheds Energy Litigation Team Jumps to Baker McKenzie
David Baay, Jack Massey, Kelsey Machado, Ian Shelton and Matthew Rawlinson were announced as the newest members of the firm’s Houston office Wednesday. Colin Murray, the firm’s North America CEO, said in a statement that the additions were part of strategic growth plans based on the potential of the Houston market.
Litigation Roundup: Fifth Circuit Asks SCOTX 2 Questions; Ex-SBA Head Goes to Prison
In this edition of Litigation Roundup, the Fifth Circuit determines 2-1 that the city of Mineral Wells can’t be sued for breaching an “illegal” contract, the Texas Supreme Court is asked to answer two certified questions in a royalty dispute involving Hilcorp Energy, and an Austin company agrees to forfeit $4.5 million for misbranding dietary supplements.
Steptoe Acquires Smyser Kaplan & Veselka ‘Lock, Stock and Barrel’
Craig Smyser, who cofounded SKV in 1995, said his firm had been approached several times over the years by national and international firms looking to expand into Texas. There’s one reason in particular why the negotiations with Steptoe, which began in May, ended with this merger: Steptoe was willing to take on every member of the SKV team.
“It’s an amazing law firm with a lot of magic,” Gwen Renigar, Steptoe’s chair, said in an interview with The Lawbook. “The magic they had is magic I did not want to disturb.”
SCOTX Rejects Justice’s Request to Remove Opponent, Justice Devine, From Ballot
The Texas Supreme Court appeared displeased with the timing of Second Court of Appeals Justice Brian Walker’s challenge to his opponent’s ability to appear on the March primary ballot. Justice Walker is running against incumbent Justice John Devine. In a ruling issued Thursday, the Texas Supreme Court denied mandamus relief, holding that even if Justice Walker promptly brought his challenge, the law requires Justice Devine be given an opportunity to cure any deficiencies in his application. “A timely challenge would advance rather than impede ballot access because it would alert all parties to any deficiencies and enable a candidate to correct them if he could,” the court wrote. “But when a party slumbers on his rights — or, indeed, does not slumber but carefully lies in wait — these principles are not advanced but impaired.”
SCOTX Decides 2 Judicial Candidate Challenge Cases, More Percolate
In two separate cases brought by judicial candidates, the Texas Supreme Court decided Wednesday that case law upholding the importance of giving candidates access to the ballot trumped the challenges trying to limit who voters get to choose from on Election Day.
Texas Supreme Court Hears UT Regents’ $51M Royalty Dispute
For 13 years, the University of Texas Board of Regents and IDEXX Laboratories seemed pleased with a royalty deal they inked for certain diagnostic tests used by veterinarians. Then an auditor told UT IDEXX had been underpaying what it owed under the structure of the deal. That finding led to litigation and a $51 million award for UT that was later undone by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston. The Texas Supreme Court has agreed to determine whether the contract binding the parties is ambiguous.
Fifth Circuit Says Lack of ‘Fair Notice’ Dooms $7.5M Jury Verdict Against Energy Futures Co., Broker
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday determined the Commodity Futures Trading Commission employed an “unprecedented interpretation” of a 39-year-old rule when it filed a “novel civil liability suit” against energy futures trading company EOX Holdings and a Houston energy trader that resulted in a $7.5 million penalty.
Mesa Airlines Settles Racial Profiling Suit
Issam Abdallah and Abderraouf Alkhawaldeh recently reached a confidential settlement with Mesa Airlines. The two men filed suit after their flight was delayed and subsequently canceled because of what they allege was racial profiling by a flight attendant and pilot. U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor had tossed the claims against Mesa on summary judgment. The Fifth Circuit revived the lawsuit in October.
Litigation Roundup: Neora Wants $6M in Fees from FTC, Cokinos Draws Client Suit over Land Deal
In this edition of litigation roundup, Cokinos Young draws a legal malpractice lawsuit over a land deal, an aviation fueling company is facing a $100 million wrongful death lawsuit over an incident at Austin-Bergstrom International Airport and more than a dozen Texas-based bus companies are sued over the transporting of migrants from the border to New York.