• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Baker Botts Successfully Leads Business Efforts to Invalidate Houston’s Clean Air Regulations

May 1, 2016 Mark Curriden

© 2016 The Texas Lawbook.

By Susan Carroll of the Houston Chronicle

(April 30) – The Texas Supreme Court on Friday struck down Houston’s air quality ordinances, ruling the city overstepped its authority to police polluters and handing industry advocates a major victory.

In an 8-1 decision, the justices ruled that ordinances requiring businesses to pay registration fees and allowing criminal sanctions for emissions violations were inconsistent with state law.

The Business Coalition for Clean Air Appeal Group, which includes giants such as Exxon Mobil and Dow Chemical Company, accused the city in a 2008 lawsuit of creating an “enforcement regime” that goes beyond its role permitted under state law.

txsupremes20151L

In 2014, about 2,800 businesses were registered with the city, which collected nearly $1.5 million through the program that year.

“What the city is trying to do is not consistent with what the Legislature has decided,” said Evan Young, an appellate law partner at Baker Botts in Houston. “We are pleased with the Court’s decision today in what is a cutting edge area of law that greatly affects the state’s energy and environmental standards processes.”

“This ruling that Houston’s ordinance is preempted by the Texas Clean Air Act is a win for the state’s standard for clean air and also for the state’s economy,” said Young, who argued the case before the state’s highest court.

Young argued that Houston’s ordinance was inconsistent with the enforcement requirements of state law, which are implemented by the TCEQ.

“The Houston ordinance turns what should be an administrative or civil law dispute about pollution into a local, criminal matter,” he said.

City Attorney Donna Edmundson issued a statement saying the court’s decision “will not dampen the city’s efforts” to assist the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality with the enforcement of environmental laws. The statement said the city will employ “other legal mechanisms” allowed under state law to monitor and take action against polluters. A spokeswoman said the city hadn’t decided whether to appeal.

Adrian Shelley, executive director of the advocacy group Air Alliance Houston, said the decision was “not the least bit surprising” but dismaying nonetheless.

“It’s pretty in-keeping with both previous judicial decisions and the direction in which our state government is moving,” he said. He cited the state Legislature’s passage of a bill last session that caps the amount local governments can collect through environmental lawsuits, Gov. Greg Abbott’s filing of a brief in support of the industry advocates in this case, and a prior legal case that made its way to the Texas Supreme Court.

“There will be more polluters who pollute with impunity,” Shelley said. “There will be a little poorer public health in the city as a result.”

For a longer version of this article, please visit the Houston Chronicle at www.houstonchronicle.com.

To read the entire Texas Supreme Court opinion, please click here: www.txcourts.gov.

© 2016 The Texas Lawbook. Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Mark Curriden

Mark Curriden is a lawyer/journalist and founder of The Texas Lawbook. In addition, he is a contributing legal correspondent for The Dallas Morning News.

View Mark’s articles

Email Mark

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • SCOTX Sides with American Midstream, Reverses Rainbow Energy Marketing’s $6.1M Win
  • SCOTX Reverses Negligence Verdict in Harvey Flooding Case
  • Q&A With Trial Lawyer Kim Bueno 
  • Fired Trucking Company Wins $9.5M Verdict in Suit Against El Rancho Supermercado
  • How Waste Management and Charles Boettcher Sealed the Stericycle Deal

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.