• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

ExxonMobil & Canada Enter Landmark Settlement in NAFTA Arbitration

February 11, 2020 Natalie Posgate

As a long-running dispute between ExxonMobil Corp. and the government of Canada over how much money the Irving-based energy giant was required to spend on research entered its sweet sixteenth year, the parties reached a multimillion-dollar settlement, lawyers for ExxonMobil announced Tuesday. 

A group of Texas-based lawyers from Norton Rose Fulbright successfully settled the case for ExxonMobil affiliate Mobil Investments Canada, Inc. (Mobil). 

The Feb. 4 settlement is believed to be the first ever between Canada and an upstream energy investor that resolves claims under the North American Free Trade Agreement or a similar treaty. The settlement also resulted in a reform that is expected to significantly reduce the amount of research and development spending required by Mobil and other energy companies producing off the coast of the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

It also marks the end to one of multiple arbitrations before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.

An international tribunal ruled in 2011 that the Canadian regulatory measure violated Mobil’s rights under NAFTA.

The legal battle dates back to 2004, when a Canadian regulatory board adopted a forced spending measure that required energy companies with producing assets in offshore Newfoundland and Labrador. It required companies to spend a certain percentage of their revenues on research and development within the province, regardless of whether such services were wanted or needed. It affected Mobil, which had an investment in the Hibernia and Terra Nova oil field development projects in the area.

Mobil and the Canadian government faced off in a previous arbitration that resulted in a 2011 ruling by an international tribunal that said the Canadian regulatory measure violated Mobil’s rights under NAFTA.

Another arbitration began in 2015 before a new tribunal that sought damages accrued from 2012 through 2015 that were not included in the first award. Canada claimed this new arbitration surpassed the statute of limitations, but those claims were rejected in a July 2018 decision. 

Mobil then got approval to amend its case for damages, including claims of future losses that would be incurred during the entire productive lives of the underlying assets. 

But before that moved forward, Mobil and Canada entered settlement talks. They reached an agreement on Jan. 8, which included Canada paying Mobil $35 million in Canadian dollars in exchange for Mobil dropping its NAFTA claims. 

The Norton Rose Fulbright team representing Mobil included Houston lawyers Kevin O’Gorman, Denton Nichols and Lena Serhan and Washington, D.C. attorney Katie Connolly. ExxonMobil in-house lawyers Tom Sikora and Stacey O’Dea were also on the team. 

The Canadian government was represented by Global Affairs Canada and Mark Luz, Adam Douglas and Maria Cristina Harris of the Trade Law Bureau. 

Natalie Posgate

Natalie Posgate covers pro bono work, public service and diversity within the Texas legal community.

View Natalie’s articles

Email Natalie

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Minority Owner of Cicis Pizza Secures $46M Verdict
  • In Landmark Decision, SCOTX Holds that Produced Water Belongs to the Mineral Estate Lessee
  • ACC San Antonio Ethics Award Winner Vincent R. Johnson Reflects on Legal Reform from Watergate to Today
  • U.S. Trustee Opposes Jackson Walker’s Jury Demand in Bankruptcy Fee Case
  • ‘The Right Side of History’ — Texas Law Students Call on Firms to Defend Rule of Law 

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.