• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory

FTC Abandons False Advertising Case Against DIRECTV

October 23, 2018 Natalie Posgate

(Oct. 23) – The Federal Trade Commission on Friday dismissed its remaining claims against DIRECTV in the middle of a bench trial that once had $4 billion at stake.

An order issued Monday by U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. of the Northern District of California affirmed the dismissal, which the FTC initiated with prejudice.

The FTC sued DIRECTV in 2015 on claims that the company misled customers in tens of thousands of advertisements over an eight-year span by allegedly failing to disclose key terms regarding the actual costs of their subscriptions.

A spokesman for the FTC declined to comment on why the commission made the decision to do so. A spokesman for AT&T, DIRECTV’s parent company, said in a statement that the company “appreciate[s] the FTC’s decision to dismiss the remainder of this case and respect[s] the lawyers who tried the case last year.”

Pete Marketos

The voluntary dismissal is a slam-dunk win for Dallas attorneys Pete Marketos and Jeff Tillotson, who represent AT&T in the matter.

According to Judge Gilliam’s order, the dismissal was a pure walk-away. He ordered both parties to bear their own fees and costs.

Jeff Tillotson

Friday’s outcome is the denouement of an opinion issued by Judge Gilliam in August that arguably killed the case for the FTC.

In that order, issued after an August 2017 bench trial, Judge Gilliam dismissed most of the FTC’s claims, ruling that his examination “found that the true terms are adequately and accurately disclosed in the advertisements.”

Still at issue was the government’s allegations that DIRECTV may have had misleading advertisements on its own website. The bench trial was slated to pick up again Oct. 29 to determine those allegations, which got cancelled after Friday’s development.

Natalie Posgate

Natalie covers litigation, trials, breaking stories, industry trends, cases and lawyers in the Texas business law community.

View Natalie’s articles

Email Natalie

©2022 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • DBJ: Prison Sentences Handed Down for UDF Execs
  • Houston Corp. Counsel Award Winners: Theresa Terrell, Niko Lorentzatos, Travis Torrence, Bo Shi and Diane Greene
  • Legal Luminaries Back Appeal in Grayson County Capital Case
  • Exclusive: AZA IP Lawyers Spin Off into New Firm 
  • Citing ‘Irregularities’ in Jury Charge, Former American Airlines Flight Attendant Seeks New Trial in Sexual Assault Case

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines

Our Partners

  • Houston Chronicle
  • Dallas Business Journal
The Texas Lawbook logo

P.O. Box 543455
Grand Prairie, TX 75054

214.232.6783

info@texaslawbook.net

© Copyright 2022 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.