• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Trials & Litigation
    • Business Litigation of the Year
    • Employment
    • Energy/Environmental
    • IP/Patent
    • Mass/Toxic Torts
    • Texas Business Court
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Judge Awards Dallas Medical Products Company $9.6 Million

November 23, 2015 Natalie Posgate

A federal judge in Dallas awarded $9.6 million to Flower Mound-based ThermoTek Inc. immediately after a jury late last week determined that a competitor fraudulently obtained the medical products manufacturer’s business information for a series of physical therapy machines.

ThermoTek, which manufactures devices used in treating deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and other medical conditions, was initially the defendant in the case when a distributor run by Chicago businessman Mike Wilford sued ThermoTek in 2010 on claims that its products were defective and thus breached an express warranty.

ThermoTek successfully transferred the lawsuit, originally filed in Chicago, to U.S. District Judge Sidney Fitzwater’s court in Dallas by countersuing Wilford and his companies on claims that he fraudulently obtained ThermoTek’s business information in order to design and sell his own medical device products.

After a three-week trial Dallas, jurors found unanimously on Friday that Wilford defrauded ThermoTek and participated in unfair competition. They awarded ThermoTek $7.56 million plus pre-judgment interest and rejected all of Wilford’s claims. Judge Fitzwater increased it to $9.6 million due to pre-judgement interest.

Marty Rose
Marty Rose

“This was little more than outright theft,” said Martin Rose of Dallas-based trial firm Rose Walker, who represented ThermoTek along with partner Chris McDowell. “Wilford’s plan all along was to take ThermoTek’s designs and profit from them.”

Chicago attorney Kathleen Lyons, who led the case for Wilford’s companies, Motion Medical Technologies, Wabash Medical Company and Orthoflex, declined to comment on the case.

Natalie Posgate

Natalie Posgate covers pro bono work, public service and diversity within the Texas legal community.

View Natalie’s articles

Email Natalie

©2026 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Judge’s Post-trial Recusal Throws Edgemere Dispute Into Limbo
  • Mark Cuban Withdraws Rule 202 Petition
  • Dallas Marina Operator Snaps Up MarineMax for $1.5B
  • Jury Finds 3M Partially Responsible for Fatal 2020 Explosion, Awards $62.3M
  • Kirkland Hires Top-Notch Trial Lawyer from Gibson Dunn

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2026 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.