A Marble Falls maker of machine parts for the oil patch lost a closely watched trademark dispute against a rival firm when a federal judge Austin refused to invalidate the defendant’s trademark protections even thought the company’s patent on the product expired years earlier. Legal experts say Judge Spark’s ruling is one of the clearest and most straightforward court decision to state that judges must consider the validity of trademarks and patents separately, even when they involve the same product . . .
You must be a subscriber to The Texas Lawbook to access this content. If you are a subscriber, and you see this message, you need premium access to view this content.
Not a subscriber? Sign up for The Texas Lawbook.