• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Deal Tracker
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

$28M Dispute Between Trucking Companies Revs Up with Motion to Dismiss

August 8, 2025 Alexa Shrake

Daimler Truck Financial Services filed a lawsuit in the Texas Business Court against Vanguard National Trailer Corporation in June, alleging fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Vanguard has moved to dismiss the case. 

Both companies are incorporated in Delaware. However, Daimler Truck Financial Services’ office is based in Denton County, while Vanguard National Trailer Corporation’s office is in Indianapolis, Indiana. 

Daimler brings several claims against Vanguard, which include fraud, negligent misrepresentation and conspiracy. 

The complaint filed before Eighth Business Court Judge Jerry Bullard in Denton County is seeking $28 million in damages. 

Daimler claims Vanguard provided KAL Trailers with floor plan financing by attempting to retain titles to hundreds of trailers sold and delivered to KAL Trailers on credit. Vanguard then allegedly provided Certification of Origin copies to KAL Trailers with “false, conflicting, and intentionally misleading certifications” that they had transferred the trailers to KAL Trailers. 

Daimler alleges it has suffered pecuniary loss, including unrecovered loans to KAL Freight and KAL Trailers, which it says amount to $28 million. 

The other defendants named in the complaint are CIMC Reefer Trailer Inc., King Trailer Lease and Rentals LLC, King Country Trailer Service and Parts LLC, Crownfour LLC and Does 1-100. 

Vanguard filed its motion to dismiss on July 28, arguing the court lacked general and specific jurisdiction over Vanguard. 

The first footnote in the motion reads, “Responsible business entities do not assert false and baseless claims that would constitute actionable business defamation if asserted out of court. Vanguard and VRTI reserve all rights to pursue all available, appropriate legal means to establish that Daimler’s allegations are absolutely false and without evidentiary support, including aggressive discovery of Daimler’s policies and procedures governing the diligence required prior to extending credit, the actual diligence done regarding KAL Freight, the information Daimler knew about KAL Freight, the diligence done by Daimler regarding its other borrowers, the information about this massive loss Daimler provided to its corporate parent, Daimler’s internal investigations into this loss, and every contemporary basis for extending $28,044,548 in credit to a company whose current Chief Restructuring Officer says employed management who are alleged to have committed or presided over significant malfeasance during the time that Daimler extended the $28,044,548.” 

Counsel for Daimler did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 

White & Case Houston partner Sean Gorman, who is representing Vanguard, declined to comment. 

Attorneys for Daimler are Foley & Lardner Dallas partner Robert Slovak, of counsel Stephen McCartin and associate Joseph Harper and Cooksey Toolen Gage Duffy Woog partner Kim Gage. 

Attorneys representing the defendants are Amarillo-based Stockard, Johnston, Brown, Netardus, & Doyle attorney James Colley and founding partner John Brown. 

The case is Daimler Truck Financial Services USA LLC v. Vanguard National Trailer Corporation, et al., 25-BC08A-0011. 

Alexa Shrake

Alexa covers litigation and trials for The Texas Lawbook.

View Alexa’s articles

Email Alexa

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Judge Liu Calls Out ‘Deplorable Management’ of Case, Points to Central Docket System as Culprit 
  • From ‘Gopher’ to Managing Partner: Larry Campagna Reflects on Chamberlain Hrdlicka’s 60th Anniversary
  • Valero GC Rich Walsh Fought the EPA and Won at the U.S. Supreme Court
  • Premium Subscriber Q&A: Rich Walsh
  • AZA to Open Dallas Office in January 

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.