• Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Sign up for email updates
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

The Texas Lawbook

Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury

  • Appellate
  • Bankruptcy
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corp. Deal Tracker/M&A
  • GCs/Corp. Legal Depts.
  • Firm Management
  • White-Collar/Regulatory
  • Pro Bono/Public Service/D&I

Jurors Have Case Against FW Pharma Boss

July 26, 2023 Bruce Tomaso

Jury deliberations began Wednesday in the federal fraud trial of Fort Worth pharmacy owner Richard Hall, who is accused of cheating U.S. taxpayers out of $55 million by billing government health insurance programs for thousands of fraudulent prescriptions.

The jury in the court of U.S. District Judge Karen Gren Scholer of Dallas deliberated through the afternoon without reaching a verdict. Deliberations are to resume at 8:30 a.m. Thursday.

A 2020 indictment issued by a grand jury in the Northern District of Texas accuses Hall and his business associates of operating “a vast network of marketers” who got millions of dollars in kickbacks to recruit doctors to write thousands of prescriptions for costly compounded medications at the defendant’s pharmacies. 

TRICARE, the federal health insurance program for U.S. military personnel, was the main public target of the swindle, prosecutors said during five days of testimony in Hall’s trial.

Hall faces one count of conspiracy, four counts of paying kickbacks and one count of money laundering.

In closing arguments Wednesday, after five days of testimony, defense attorney John D. Cline of San Francisco said Hall believed that millions of dollars paid to marketers to steer prescriptions to Hall’s pharmacies constituted a legitimate business expense.

“Mr. Hall did his level best to run a good business,” Cline said. He further noted that six of the 10 witnesses the government called at trial were originally indicted with Hall. Cline said those witnesses entered into plea agreements to save their own necks by agreeing to finger Hall as the bad guy. The government, he said, “put corrupt men on the witness stand to convict Mr. Hall.”

Prosecutor Kate Payerle said in the government’s closing argument that prosecution witnesses testifying under plea agreements were the crooks Hall chose to do business with.

“The government didn’t choose these witnesses,” she said. “The defendant did.”

©2025 The Texas Lawbook.

Content of The Texas Lawbook is controlled and protected by specific licensing agreements with our subscribers and under federal copyright laws. Any distribution of this content without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.

If you see any inaccuracy in any article in The Texas Lawbook, please contact us. Our goal is content that is 100% true and accurate. Thank you.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Stories

  • Texas Reaches $1.375B Settlement with Google in Data Privacy Suits
  • KBR Gets Complete Defense Win in Houston Trial Over $18B Mexican Refinery Job
  • P.S. — Hispanic Law Foundation’s ‘Thank You’ is ‘Deeper Than It’s Ever Been,’ President Says at Scholarship Luncheon 
  • Jackson Walker Hires Former Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht
  • First CEO of San Antonio Legal Services Association Steps Down from Non-profit, Board Initiates Search  

Footer

Who We Are

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Submit a News Tip

Stay Connected

  • Sign up for email updates
  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Premium Subscriber Editorial Calendar

Our Partners

  • The Dallas Morning News
The Texas Lawbook logo

1409 Botham Jean Blvd.
Unit 811
Dallas, TX 75215

214.232.6783

© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.