Last year, there were 135 Texas-related deals (one that involves a party headquartered in Texas or advised by Texas-based lawyers) submitted to The Texas Lawbook‘s exclusive Corporate Deal Tracker that reached or broke the $1 billion barrier — some of them by a lot. The deals had an aggregate value of $627.2 billion, slightly below 2023 but much higher than in 2021, the record year of rebounding from the pandemic, against which many firms have measured the market in recent years.
Top Deals of 2024: When AI Met M&A (and Everything Else)
This is our list, a roster of transactions that caught our attention this year among the more than 2,000 Texas-related transactions submitted to the Corporate Deal Tracker in 2024. These “Texas-related” deals are transactions that involve either Texas-headquartered parties, Texas-based lawyers or, better yet, both.
How Texas M&A Lawyers Are Preparing for 2025
Now that the new year is here, many Texas M&A lawyers are preparing for potential developments in the upcoming year and identifying their focus areas. Many law firms are optimistic about the deal space in 2025, anticipating increased activity; however, they also plan to closely monitor how the new presidential administration may affect deals and their clients.

Lawbook Hires Nick Peck to Cover M&A, Restructuring
Earlier this month, The Texas Lawbook hired Nick Peck as its new M&A and restructuring reporter, stepping into the role previously held by veteran deals newshound Claire Poole, who retired in August.
CDT Roundup: 15 Deals, 12 Firms, 186 Lawyers, $5.3B
The biggest deal reported last week was the $2.4 billion sale of “non-core” assets along the Texas-Louisiana Gulf Coast by Dow, the chemical giant. The sale involved a 40 percent stake in Dow InfraCo sold to alternative asset manage Macquarie. The deal is only the latest in a series of “non-core” sell-offs, a phrase that is becoming as common as “consolidation” in the current market. The CDT takes a look at the “non-core” transaction trend and an observer of the Dow deal who less than impressed. And, of course, the usual report on last week’s deals and dealmakers.
CDT Roundup: 16 Deals, 10 Firms, 231 Lawyers, $4.8B
In the year that will soon be past, the sheer volume of energy-related, or energy-adjacent transactions are worth noting. Whether in O&G per se, data center energy demands or the more mundane multitude of PE acquisitions in HVAC manufacturing and service companies, the sides seem okay with the value. So, we weren’t that surprised by the November findings of the semi-annual Haynes Boone Borrowing Base Redeterminations Survey. The CDT Roundup takes a look at the details, along with the usual run-down of the week’s M&A deals and the lawyers behind them.
CDT Roundup: 15 Deals, 15 Firms, 153 Lawyers, $4.6B
For some, it may be too soon to talk about it, but business leaders are already weighing in on how their industries might be impacted by the election results. In one of the first survey’s we’ve seen, Endeavor Business Intelligence deployed a short questionnaire to U.S. business leaders on their perceptions of the upcoming change in administrations. There were 160 respondents, not bad for a one-week project; and the answers proved more complex than one might expect. That and the usual review of last week’s reported transactions.
CDT Roundup: 17 Deals, 11 Firms, 245 Lawyers, $11.5B
Methane emissions are a sticky business in Texas, especially in the Permian where the colorless, odorless substance is simply a by-product of exploration and production for oil and gas on a massive scale. An $88 million satellite set into orbit in March, however, has begun to visualize and quantify the problem. The picture isn’t pretty. But situation is complicated, as the CDT Roundup reports this week — along with its usual survey of transactions.
How 2024’s Megadeals have Slowed In-House Legal Hiring in Texas’ Energy Sector
While these megadeals promise efficiency gains and economies of scale, they’ve had a chilling effect on one critical area: in-house legal hiring. Consolidation has temporarily shifted priorities, leaving legal teams focused on deal execution, integration, compliance and cost-cutting.
Joint Ventures Demystified — A Practitioner’s Guide to Structuring Successful Partnerships
In today’s global business environment, market participants continuously seek innovative ways to grow their businesses, obtain capital to execute their business plans and leverage shared resources. One popular strategy is forming a joint venture, which is a business arrangement where two or more parties pool resources to achieve a common commercial goal. Structuring a JV is complex, and success hinges on careful planning, negotiation and management, as poorly structured JVs can lead to conflicts, inefficiencies and ultimately failed outcomes.
This article explores several key issues to be addressed when forming a joint venture and provides a roadmap for avoiding some common pitfalls that derail many partnerships. By carefully defining a JV’s scope, negotiating for appropriate consent rights, protecting against leakage from affiliate agreements, addressing fiduciary duties and establishing clear transfer provisions, parties can create a JV structure that helps to ensure alignment and maximizes the likelihood of success for all involved.
- « Go to Previous Page
- Go to page 1
- Go to page 2
- Go to page 3
- Go to page 4
- Interim pages omitted …
- Go to page 46
- Go to Next Page »