Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury
Roel Canales will get another shot at proving Pay and Save was negligent in the way it displayed watermelons. But the Fourth Court of Appeals panel said the evidence supporting the gross negligence claim was too weak and ordered Canales take nothing on that claim.
The six-year bear of a legal battle between the Electric Reliability Council of Texas and Panda Power has again reached the Texas Supreme Court. In a case being watched by scores of lawyers in the Winter Storm Uri litigation, ERCOT wants the state’s highest court to declare that it is part of the state government and thus immune from civil lawsuits. Panda claims ERCOT knowingly produced false market data in 2011 and 2012 that led it to invest $2.2 billion to build three new power plants and doesn't deserve immunity.
A handful of Fifth Circuit judges seem to have it out for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and “the agency’s current activism.” Two judges issued a concurring opinion that clearly invites defendants being accused of financial fraud to challenge the SEC’s use of “no admit, no deny” settlement agreements. “If you want to settle, SEC’s policy says, ‘Hold your tongue, and don’t say anything truthful – ever' — or get bankrupted by having to continue litigating with the SEC,” Judge Edith Jones wrote. “A more effective prior restraint is hard to imagine.”
The Texas Lawbook has insight from several legal experts who say they understand Judge Jones’ concerns but say eliminating the “no admit, no deny” provisions in settlements would cause tremendous upheaval in the system and place defendants at an even bigger disadvantage in their negotiations with the federal agency.
After what seemed a last-minute recusal in a case with millions on the line, the Texas Supreme Court asked for the governor's appointment of two temporary justices to break a probable stalemate in reaching a resolution in the Volkswagen emissions-cheating scandal case. Now the court must determine whether, as VW argues, the governor's commission of special justices poses due-process violations.
A Houston appellate court has reversed a 2019 jury verdict that awarded European cosmetics distributor Benelux Cosmetics $2.7 million against Houston-based gel nail polish manufacturer GHP Nail Systems and its parent company. The decision by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals is a win for a group lawyers at Hicks Thomas and Wright Close Barger.
The high court's decision in the long-running Terence Andrus v. Texas capital-murder case was a surprise for Andrus’s lawyers who worked hard to convince courts that Andrus was beset by egregious ineffective assistance of counsel at his earliest trials.
The Texas Supreme Court determines hemp dealers have no constitutional right to manufacture hemp to smoke.
The Texas Supreme Court held that the two companies seeking to take private property for the controversial Dallas-to-Houston high-speed rail have a statutory right to exercise eminent domain to take right-of-way for the 240-mile rail line.
© Copyright 2025 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.