A Sherman jury dealt federal prosecutors a rare acquittal Tuesday in the trial of a Dallas-area doctor accused in an alleged fraudulent scheme to bill insurance companies for medical services provided to injured university student athletes. Jurors deliberated about four hours before finding Dr. Kyle Carter not guilty of a single count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.
By Ditching Chevron Deference, SCOTUS Drastically Changes the Litigation and Compliance Landscape
What will the post-Chevron era look like? The full and future impact of overturning Chevron is unclear, but it is safe to assume that innumerable businesses and industries will be impacted.
Dallas Lawyer Obtains DOJ Case Closure for Armenian Businessmen
Armenian brothers Artyom Khachatryan and Gurgen Khachatryan faced accusations that their multimillion-dollar Beverly Hills mansion was purchased with bribes. Following a two-year investigation, the government announced it had closed the case and reached a settlement with the family to share proceeds from the sale of the luxury estate. The resolution is touted as a significant victory by the brothers’ Dallas lawyer, Ephraim “Fry” Wernick.
Texas AG Signals Plans to Aggressively Enforce Texas’ New Data Privacy & Security Act
The Texas Data Privacy & Security Act became effective July 1. Along with 17 other states, Texas has now enacted data privacy protections that will require many businesses to comply with new regulations about the collection, use, processing and treatment of personal data. Businesses that operate in Texas should be aware of, and prepared to comply with, the TDPSA immediately. Companies should coordinate with their technology and legal teams to review policies and procedures and ensure their privacy policy, terms and conditions, and other documentation comply with the Texas law and other applicable privacy and cybersecurity regulations to ensure compliance and avoid enforcement actions by the Texas attorney general.
The SEC’s Evolving Enforcement Authority: From Courtroom to Administrative Proceedings
For more than a decade, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has been able to bring enforcement actions in either federal court or the agency’s internal venue. Not anymore. The U.S. Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy significantly curtailing the SEC’s ability to use its administrative proceedings to impose civil penalties for securities fraud. Instead, these cases must be tried in federal district court, where a defendant’s Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial is available. This decision not only alters the landscape for securities fraud enforcement but also signals potential broader implications for the enforcement powers of federal agencies across the government.
Coupled with a series of other recent rulings by the Court, this verdict adds to a body of law with potentially far-reaching implications for the enforcement powers of all federal agencies.