Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury
Texas-born Mithun Mansinghani will be making his first appearance before the U.S. Supreme Court next week as Oklahoma's Solicitor General. Since the case will be argued via teleconference he won't actually be appearing, but that doesn't make the case any less important, or the pressure any less intense. Tony Mauro profiles Mansinghani and what's at stake in the case.
Your dog or your 4-year-old are cute additions to the office Zoom conference, but if you happen to be arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court anytime soon, you might want to get out of the house. Come Monday, the court will be taking their arguments by teleconference and the experience will be...different. We asked Dallas trial lawyer Mark Werbner for his advice on adapting the chance of a lifetime to the Age of Social Distance.
Amicus involvement has grown steadily in numbers and importance at the Texas Supreme Court, according to a five-year study by Haynes and Boone. This article examines the trends and sources of amicus filings at the state's high court.
Any other day, a plaintiff would be thrilled that the Texas Supreme Court upheld a $40 million jury verdict in their favor. But Highland Capital is no ordinary plaintiff and its fraud case against Credit Suisse over a 2007 Las Vegas residential real estate project has been far from run-of-the-mill.
Dallas-based Varsity Brands has sealed last year's $3.1 million Alabama jury verdict with a final win at the Supreme Court of Alabama. The court let stand a judgment against Jostens for luring 47 school clients by hiring two salesmen bearing key trade secrets from a Varsity Brands subsidiary.
Dallas trial lawyer Bill Brewer should not have been sanctioned by a Lubbock judge for conducting a survey or poll months before a trial because there “is no evidence” that the controversial attorney acted in bad faith or tried to improperly tamper with the jury process, the Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday.
A new tool is now available for companies sued in Texas, Louisiana or Mississippi, thanks to a recent Fifth Circuit decision. Nicholas Sarokhanian of Holland & Knight explains.
A decision issued Monday in the U.S. Supreme Court narrowed the scope of what can be appealed during an inter partes review of patent cases, providing some clarity to portions of the America Invents Act. The case originated in a Texas court and pitted two Dallas lawyers against each other at oral argument.
The Supreme Court of Texas took the unusual step of vacating a lower court decision in an already moot case involving the Texas Education Agency. In a per curiam decision, the court said it wanted to avoid future “gamesmanship” on issues of public importance. Janet Elliott has the details.
Patrick O'Connell is an Austin-based solo whose practice is almost exclusively qui tam cases. He chases fraud on behalf of clients in cases in which the State of Texas is on his side. But in a case now officially before the U.S. Supreme Court, O'Connell finds himself facing off against the Lone Star State in a challenge to its COVID-19 abortion restrictions. The Lawbook's Tony Mauro explains.
© Copyright 2026 The Texas Lawbook
The content on this website is protected under federal Copyright laws. Any use without the consent of The Texas Lawbook is prohibited.
